Construct · 1 fields · 2 citations
One name. One construct. A landmark on the map.
● anchor · a standalone construct Nearest construct by meaningfilter bubblecompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to algorithmic imaginary is filter bubble.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
A single standalone construct; nearby constructs are located against it in the Collider. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Taina Bucher introduced the construct in 2017 in Information, Communication & Society, defining the algorithmic imaginary as the ways people imagine, perceive, and experience algorithms (the "ordinary affects" of, for example, the Facebook News Feed) and how those imaginings shape their conduct whether or not their beliefs about the algorithm are accurate. The key move is that the imagined algorithm has real effects: users adjust what they post, how they interpret visibility, and how they feel about a platform based on a folk sense of the system, so the imaginary becomes productive of the very behavior algorithms then act on. Swart (2021) extended the idea empirically, showing how young people understand, feel about, and engage with algorithmic news selection through such everyday intuitions. The construct is distinctive because its object is not the algorithm as engineered but the algorithm as lived and felt, placing it squarely in media and communication studies rather than in computer science.[1][2]
Next
See how algorithmic imaginary sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this entryCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct