Construct · 1 fields · 1 citations

argumentation schemes: a standalone construct

One name. One construct. A landmark on the map.

● anchor · a standalone construct Nearest construct by meaning·not indexed
argumentationschemes1 CONSTRUCTArgumentation schemesWALTON · ARGUMENTATION THEORY

A single standalone construct; nearby constructs are located against it in the Collider. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

Argumentation theory

stereotypical patterns of defeasible everyday reasoning, each with its own critical questions for evaluation.

In argumentation theory, argumentation schemes refers to stereotypical patterns of defeasible everyday reasoning, each with its own critical questions for evaluation. This meaning comes from Walton (2008) in Argumentation Schemes.[1]

Unit
Recovery means
Measured by

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how argumentation schemes sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this entry

Nearby constructs

reasoning6 fields · 17 citationsjingle · one name, six constructs

References

  1. Walton, D., Reed, C., & Macagno, F. (2008). Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511802034

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct