Construct · 1 fields · 1 citations

Bar-Hillel-Carnap paradox: a standalone construct

One name. One construct. A landmark on the map.

● anchor · a standalone construct Nearest construct by meaning·not indexed
Bar-Hillel-Carnapparadox1 CONSTRUCTBar-Hillel-CarnapFLORIDI · PHILOSOPHY OF

A single standalone construct; nearby constructs are located against it in the Collider. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

Philosophy of information

the result that under classical semantic information theory a contradiction carries maximal information, which a theory of strongly semantic information avoids.

In philosophy of information, Bar-Hillel-Carnap paradox refers to the result that under classical semantic information theory a contradiction carries maximal information, which a theory of strongly semantic information avoids. This meaning comes from Floridi (2004) in Minds and Machines.[1]

Unit
Recovery means
Measured by

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how Bar-Hillel-Carnap paradox sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this entry

Nearby constructs

information4 fields · 5 citationsjingle · one word, four constructsparadox3 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, three constructs

References

  1. Floridi, L. (2004). Outline of a Theory of Strongly Semantic Information. Minds and Machines, 14(2), 197-221. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:mind.0000021684.50925.c9

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct