Construct · 1 fields · 1 citations

bipolar argumentation framework: a standalone construct

One name. One construct. A landmark on the map.

● anchor · a standalone construct Nearest construct by meaning·not indexed

A single standalone construct; nearby constructs are located against it in the Collider. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

Argumentation and AI

an extension of abstract argumentation with a support relation alongside attack, with acceptability defined over both.

In argumentation and AI, bipolar argumentation framework refers to an extension of abstract argumentation with a support relation alongside attack, with acceptability defined over both. This meaning comes from Cayrol (2005) in Lecture Notes in Computer Science.[1]

Unit
Recovery means
Measured by

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how bipolar argumentation framework sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in Collider Export BibTeX Report this entry

Nearby constructs

attack4 fields · 10 citationsjingle · one word, four constructs extension3 fields · 3 citationsjingle · one word, three constructs relation4 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, four constructs

References

Cayrol, C., & Lagasquie-Schiex, M. C. (2005). On the Acceptability of Arguments in Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 378-389). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11518655_33

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct