Construct · 1 fields · 1 citations

blackmail paradox: a standalone construct

One name. One construct. A landmark on the map.

● anchor · a standalone construct Nearest construct by meaning·not indexed

A single standalone construct; nearby constructs are located against it in the Collider. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

Law and economics

the puzzle that blackmail is a crime although each of its parts, revealing information and asking for money, is lawful on its own.

In law and economics, blackmail paradox refers to the puzzle that blackmail is a crime although each of its parts, revealing information and asking for money, is lawful on its own. This meaning comes from Lindgren (1984) in Columbia Law Review.[1]

Unit
Recovery means
Measured by

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how blackmail paradox sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in Collider Export BibTeX Report this entry

Nearby constructs

information4 fields · 5 citationsjingle · one word, four constructs paradox3 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, three constructs

References

Lindgren, J. (1984). Unraveling the Paradox of Blackmail. Columbia Law Review, 84(3), 670. https://doi.org/10.2307/1122502

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct