Construct · 1 fields · 4 citations

cogito ergo sum: a standalone construct

One name. One construct. A landmark on the map.

● anchor · a standalone construct Nearest construct by meaningegocompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to cogito ergo sum is ego.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

cogitoergo sum1 CONSTRUCTCogitoDESCARTES · I THINK

A single standalone construct; nearby constructs are located against it in the Collider. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

Philosophy

The thinking self taken as an indubitable first certainty

René Descartes first stated the idea in his 1637 Discourse on the Method as “je pense, donc je suis” (I think, therefore I am), and gave it its canonical Latin form “cogito, ergo sum” in the 1644 Principia Philosophiae. The claim is that the very act of thinking, including the act of doubting, proves that the thinker exists: a person deceived about everything else still cannot be deceived that they are thinking while they think it, so “I exist” is certain each time it is affirmed. Descartes reached it through radical skepticism, deliberately doubting the senses, the external world, and even mathematics, and found the thinking self to be the one belief that survives, which he then used as the first, indubitable foundation for rebuilding knowledge. In his 1641 Meditations on First Philosophy he restated the point as “I am, I exist,” necessarily true whenever it is put forward or conceived in the mind. What makes the cogito a landmark is its role as a proposed bedrock certainty in epistemology and metaphysics, the study of knowledge and of what exists: a single self-verifying claim from which later thinkers have long debated whether knowledge and the nature of the self can be derived.[1][3][2][4]

Unit
A single self-referential proposition asserting the existence of the thinking self
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Examined through philosophical argument and analysis of the self-referential utterance rather than by empirical measurement

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how cogito ergo sum sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this entry

Nearby constructs

qualia1 fields · 3 citationsanchor · a standalone constructintentionality3 fields · 3 citationsjingle · one word, three constructsbelief4 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, four constructs

References

  1. Descartes, R. (1637). Discours de la méthode pour bien conduire sa raison, et chercher la vérité dans les sciences [Discourse on the method]. Jan Maire.
  2. Descartes, R. (1641). Meditationes de prima philosophia [Meditations on first philosophy]. Michel Soly.
  3. Descartes, R. (1644). Principia philosophiae [Principles of philosophy]. Louis Elzevir.
  4. Hintikka, J. (1962). Cogito, ergo sum: Inference or performance? The Philosophical Review, 71(1), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.2307/2183678

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct