Construct · 1 fields · 1 citations

customization paradox in CSA: a standalone construct

One name. One construct. A landmark on the map.

● anchor · a standalone construct Nearest construct by meaning·not indexed

A single standalone construct; nearby constructs are located against it in the Collider. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

Rural sociology

the finding that CSA farms customize shares to retain members, yet customization can weaken the shared-risk commitment that originally defined CSA.

In rural sociology, customization paradox in CSA refers to the finding that CSA farms customize shares to retain members, yet customization can weaken the shared-risk commitment that originally defined CSA. This meaning comes from Galt (2019) in Journal of Rural Studies.[1]

Unit
Recovery means
Measured by

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how customization paradox in CSA sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in Collider Export BibTeX Report this entry

Nearby constructs

commitment5 fields · 9 citationsjingle · one name, five constructs paradox3 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, three constructs

References

Galt, R. E., Bradley, K., Christensen, L. O., & Munden-Dixon, K. (2019). The (un)making of “CSA people”: Member retention and the customization paradox in Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) in California. Journal of Rural Studies, 65, 172-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.10.006

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct