Construct · 4 fields · 4 citations
One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.
● jingle · one word, four constructs Nearest construct by meaningcodecompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to degeneracy is code.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
The condition in which two or more distinct quantum states of a system share exactly the same energy: such an energy level is called degenerate, and the number of independent states sitting at that level is the degeneracy of the level. Griffiths and Schroeter's 2018 Introduction to Quantum Mechanics describes how symmetry gives rise to degenerate levels and how a perturbation, such as an applied magnetic field, can split them into separated energies, as in the Zeeman effect. The referent is a count of distinct states pinned to one energy, not a code that spells an amino acid with several codons, a collapsed limiting case of a geometric figure, or the ability of unlike biological parts to do the same job.[1]
The property that the genetic code is redundant: most of the twenty amino acids are specified by more than one of the sixty-one coding triplets, or codons, so several different codons can carry the same instruction. Crick's 1966 wobble hypothesis, in Codon-anticodon pairing: The wobble hypothesis, explained the pattern by proposing that the third base of a codon pairs loosely, or wobbles, with the transfer RNA anticodon, so one transfer RNA can read several codons that differ only in that last position. The referent is a redundancy in a molecular coding scheme, not a set of quantum states at one energy, a degenerate figure in geometry, or the capacity of different biological structures to perform one function.[2]
A degenerate case is a limiting or special example in which a mathematical object loses the structure that defines its general type and collapses into something simpler. A conic section becomes degenerate when the cutting plane passes through the cone's apex, so the curve is really a single point, one line, or a pair of crossing lines rather than an ellipse, parabola, or hyperbola; likewise a square matrix is called degenerate, or singular, when it collapses volume to zero and has no inverse. Richter-Gebert's 2011 Perspectives on Projective Geometry treats such degenerate conics as boundary cases within the wider family of all conics. The referent is a structure-losing special case of a general form, not quantum states sharing an energy, redundant codons, or interchangeable biological parts.[3]
In biology, degeneracy is the ability of elements that are structurally different to perform the same function or yield the same output. It is set apart from redundancy, where identical elements do the same job: degenerate elements are not alike, yet they converge on one result, as when different neural circuits, genes, or metabolic pathways produce equivalent behaviour. Edelman and Gally's 2001 Degeneracy and complexity in biological systems argued this is a ubiquitous property of living systems and both a requirement for and a product of natural selection. The referent is a many-different-parts-to-one-function relation in biology, not a coincidence of energy levels, a code's redundant spelling, or a collapsed geometric case.[4]
Next
See how degeneracy sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct