Construct · 2 fields · 2 citations
One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.
● jingle · one word, two constructs Nearest construct by meaningtraitcompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to disposition is trait.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
A disposition in metaphysics is a property a thing has in virtue of what it would do or how it would change under specified conditions, even when nothing is currently happening: a glass is fragile because it would break if struck, and sugar is soluble because it would dissolve if placed in water. Such dispositional properties are picked out by a conditional, so that to be fragile is, on the simplest analysis, to be such that if struck one would break. In The Concept of Mind (1949) Gilbert Ryle used this idea to argue that many mental terms name dispositions rather than inner episodes, so that to say someone is vain or knows French is to say how they are disposed to behave, not to report a hidden private event. The referent is a modal tendency, a standing capacity to manifest a behaviour when the triggering conditions are met, and it is a property of things and minds studied in metaphysics, not a personality trait measured on a scale, a court's ruling, or an army's layout.[1]
In personality psychology a disposition is a trait, a relatively stable internal tendency to think, feel, and act in a consistent way across situations and over time. Someone high in the disposition of conscientiousness is expected to be orderly and dependable whether at work or at home, and traits like it are the dispositional units of most personality models, including the Big Five, where each person is placed on a set of broad, enduring dimensions. Walter Mischel's Personality and Assessment (1968) challenged this picture, arguing that behaviour is far less consistent across situations than trait language assumes, which opened the long person-situation debate over how stable such dispositions really are. The referent is a measured regularity in a person's conduct, estimated from self-report or observation and expressed as a position on a trait scale, and it is not a metaphysician's conditional tendency, a court's decision, or the placing of troops.[2]
Next
See how disposition sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct