Construct · 1 fields · 1 citations

echelon: a standalone construct

One name. One construct. A landmark on the map.

● anchor · a standalone construct Nearest construct by meaning·not indexed
echelon1 CONSTRUCTUpper echelonsHAMBRICK & MASON · 1984

A single standalone construct; nearby constructs are located against it in the Collider. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

Management theory

A firm mirrors its top executives

In strategic management, upper-echelons theory holds that an organisation becomes a reflection of its most senior managers: because executives face more information than they can fully process, their choices are filtered through their own experiences, values, and cognitive frames, so the demographic and psychological make-up of the top team helps predict a firm's strategy and performance. Hambrick and Mason's 1984 Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers set out the framework and the observable-characteristics approach that lets researchers proxy those frames. The referent here is a level of organisational command and the people who occupy it, a social-science construct about managerial cognition that shares nothing with a crosswind of cyclists or a staircase of faults but the word 'echelon'.[1]

Unit
The composition and characteristics of a firm's senior management team
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Proxied by executives' observable characteristics (age, tenure, education, functional background) linked to strategic choices and firm outcomes

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how echelon sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this entry

Nearby constructs

breakaway1 fields · 1 citationsanchor · a standalone construct

References

  1. Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.2307/258434

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct