Construct · 1 fields · 1 citations

interjudge sentencing disparity: a standalone construct

One name. One construct. A landmark on the map.

● anchor · a standalone construct Nearest construct by meaning·not indexed
interjudgesentencing disparity1 CONSTRUCTInterjudge sentencingANDERSON · COURTS AND

A single standalone construct; nearby constructs are located against it in the Collider. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

Courts and sentencing

systematic differences in sentence length across judges hearing comparable randomly assigned cases, measured as the expected gap between judges.

In courts and sentencing, interjudge sentencing disparity refers to systematic differences in sentence length across judges hearing comparable randomly assigned cases, measured as the expected gap between judges. This meaning comes from Anderson (1999) in The Journal of Law and Economics.[1]

Unit
Recovery means
Measured by

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how interjudge sentencing disparity sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this entry

Nearby constructs

hearing1 fields · 1 citationsanchor · a standalone constructsentence3 fields · 3 citationsjingle · one word, three constructssentencing disparity1 fields · 1 citationsanchor · a standalone construct

References

  1. Anderson, J. M., Kling, J. R., & Stith, K. (1999). Measuring Interjudge Sentencing Disparity: Before and After the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. The Journal of Law and Economics, 42(S1), 271-308. https://doi.org/10.1086/467426

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct