Construct · 1 fields · 1 citations

miners paradox: a standalone construct

One name. One construct. A landmark on the map.

● anchor · a standalone construct Nearest construct by meaning·not indexed

A single standalone construct; nearby constructs are located against it in the Collider. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

Logic

puzzle in which it seems one ought to block neither mine shaft, yet if the miners are in either shaft one ought to block it, challenging deontic conditionals.

In logic, miners paradox refers to puzzle in which it seems one ought to block neither mine shaft, yet if the miners are in either shaft one ought to block it, challenging deontic conditionals. This meaning comes from Kolodny (2010) in Journal of Philosophy.[1]

Unit
Recovery means
Measured by

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how miners paradox sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in Collider Export BibTeX Report this entry

Nearby constructs

block3 fields · 6 citationsjingle · one word, three constructs mine2 fields · 2 citationsjingle · one word, two constructs paradox3 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, three constructs

References

Kolodny, N., MacFarlane, J., & Journal of Philosophy, Inc. (2010). Ifs and Oughts. Journal of Philosophy, 107(3), 115-143. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil2010107310

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct