Construct · 1 fields · 1 citations

multiple system atrophy consensus criteria: a standalone construct

One name. One construct. A landmark on the map.

● anchor · a standalone construct Nearest construct by meaning·not indexed
multiple system atrophyconsensus criteria1 CONSTRUCTMultiple system atrophyGILMAN · NEUROLOGY

A single standalone construct; nearby constructs are located against it in the Collider. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

Neurology

consensus criteria classifying multiple system atrophy as possible or probable from autonomic failure combined with poorly levodopa-responsive parkinsonism or cerebellar ataxia.

In neurology, multiple system atrophy consensus criteria refers to consensus criteria classifying multiple system atrophy as possible or probable from autonomic failure combined with poorly levodopa-responsive parkinsonism or cerebellar ataxia. This meaning comes from Gilman (2008) in Neurology.[1]

Unit
Recovery means
Measured by

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how multiple system atrophy consensus criteria sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this entry

Nearby constructs

consensus4 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, four constructsfailure4 fields · 6 citationsjingle · one word, four constructs

References

  1. Gilman, S., Wenning, G. K., Low, P. A., Brooks, D. J., Mathias, C. J., Trojanowski, J. Q., Wood, N. W., Colosimo, C., Dürr, A., Fowler, C. J., Kaufmann, H., Klockgether, T., Lees, A., Poewe, W., Quinn, N., Revesz, T., Robertson, D., Sandroni, P., Seppi, K., & Vidailhet, M. (2008). Second consensus statement on the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy. Neurology, 71(9), 670-676. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000324625.00404.15

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct