Construct · 1 fields · 1 citations

nonfluent/agrammatic variant primary progressive aphasia: a standalone construct

One name. One construct. A landmark on the map.

● anchor · a standalone construct Nearest construct by meaning·not indexed
nonfluent/agrammatic variantprimary progressive aphasia1 CONSTRUCTNonfluent/agrammaticGORNO-TEMPINI ·

A single standalone construct; nearby constructs are located against it in the Collider. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

Speech-language pathology

a primary progressive aphasia variant defined by agrammatic production and/or effortful, halting speech with speech sound errors, per the 2011 consensus criteria.

In speech-language pathology, nonfluent/agrammatic variant primary progressive aphasia refers to a primary progressive aphasia variant defined by agrammatic production and/or effortful, halting speech with speech sound errors, per the 2011 consensus criteria. This meaning comes from Gorno-Tempini (2011) in Neurology.[1]

Unit
Recovery means
Measured by

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how nonfluent/agrammatic variant primary progressive aphasia sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this entry

Nearby constructs

logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia1 fields · 1 citationsanchor · a standalone constructaphasia1 fields · 1 citationsanchor · a standalone constructconsensus4 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, four constructs

References

  1. Gorno-Tempini, M. L., Hillis, A. E., Weintraub, S., Kertesz, A., Mendez, M., Cappa, S. F., Ogar, J. M., Rohrer, J. D., Black, S., Boeve, B. F., Manes, F., Dronkers, N. F., Vandenberghe, R., Rascovsky, K., Patterson, K., Miller, B. L., Knopman, D. S., Hodges, J. R., Mesulam, M. M., & Grossman, M. (2011). Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants. Neurology, 76(11), 1006-1014. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0b013e31821103e6

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct