Construct · 1 fields · 2 citations

reliance: a standalone construct

One name. One construct. A landmark on the map.

● anchor · a single construct in contract law Nearest construct by meaning·not indexed
reliance1 CONSTRUCTReliance interestFULLER & PERDUE · 1936

A single standalone construct; nearby constructs are located against it in the Collider. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

Contract law

Protecting what a party gave up in reliance on a promise

In contract law, the reliance interest is the value of a party's position before a promise was made (what they would have had if they had never relied), which contract damages may protect by reimbursing wasted expenditure and forgone opportunities caused by relying on the broken promise. Fuller and Perdue's two-part 1936–1937 study distinguished this reliance interest from the expectation interest (the promised benefit) and the restitution interest (gains conferred on the promisor), reframing why and how far contract damages should run. The referent is a measure of recoverable loss anchored to detrimental reliance, central both to damages doctrine and to promissory estoppel, where reliance alone can make a promise enforceable.[1][2]

Unit
The loss suffered through detrimental reliance on a promise
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Quantified as the expenditures and opportunities lost in reliance, restoring the party toward their pre-promise position

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how reliance sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this entry

Nearby constructs

damage(s)4 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, four constructsestoppel1 fields · 3 citationsanchor · a standalone legal doctrineadjunct2 fields · 2 citationsjingle · one word, two constructs

References

  1. Fuller, L. L., & Perdue, W. R. (1936). The reliance interest in contract damages: 1. The Yale Law Journal, 46(1), 52–96. https://doi.org/10.2307/791632
  2. Fuller, L. L., & Perdue, W. R. (1937). The reliance interest in contract damages: 2. The Yale Law Journal, 46(3), 373–420. https://doi.org/10.2307/791834

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct