Construct · 1 fields · 4 citations

renormalization: a standalone construct

One name. One construct. A landmark on the map.

● anchor · a standalone construct Nearest construct by meaningregularizationcompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to renormalization is regularization.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

renormalization1 CONSTRUCTRenormalizationTOMONAGA · QFT INFINITIES

A single standalone construct; nearby constructs are located against it in the Collider. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

Theoretical physics

Absorbing the infinities of quantum field theory into a few physical parameters

The renormalization program grew out of the late-1940s effort to make quantum electrodynamics, the quantum field theory of electrons and light, give finite answers: Sin-Itiro Tomonaga (1946), Julian Schwinger (1948), and Richard Feynman (1949) independently showed how the infinite quantities that appear when one calculates things like an electron's self-energy can be absorbed into a redefinition of the electron's measured mass and charge, and Freeman Dyson (1949) proved these approaches equivalent and organised them into a systematic procedure. In plain terms, renormalization is a set of techniques for handling the infinities that arise in quantum field theory by folding them into the values of a few physical parameters, so that what remains are finite predictions that can be compared with experiment. Murray Gell-Mann and Francis Low (1954) then observed that the effective charge depends on the energy scale at which it is measured, and Kenneth Wilson (1971) developed this into the renormalization group, a method that tracks how a theory's parameters change as one moves between short and long distance scales. As a landmark, renormalization spans two roles: it is the procedure that made quantum electrodynamics one of the most precisely tested theories in physics, and, through the renormalization group, it became a framework for understanding phase transitions and critical phenomena in condensed matter.[1][2][3][4]

Unit
A calculational program in quantum field theory, applied per theory and per redefined physical parameter (for example mass or charge)
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Carried out by regularising divergent integrals (for example a momentum cutoff or dimensional regularisation), fixing the redefined parameters to experimentally measured values, and confirming that the resulting predictions are independent of the regulator

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how renormalization sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this entry

Nearby constructs

charge1 fields · 2 citationsanchor · a standalone constructdecimation2 fields · 3 citationsjingle · one word, two constructseffort2 fields · 2 citationsjingle · one word, two constructs

References

  1. Tomonaga, S. (1946). On a relativistically invariant formulation of the quantum theory of wave fields. Progress of Theoretical Physics, 1(2), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.1.27
  2. Dyson, F. J. (1949). The radiation theories of Tomonaga, Schwinger, and Feynman. Physical Review, 75(3), 486–502. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.75.486
  3. Gell-Mann, M., & Low, F. E. (1954). Quantum electrodynamics at small distances. Physical Review, 95(5), 1300–1312. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.95.1300
  4. Wilson, K. G. (1971). Renormalization group and critical phenomena. I. Renormalization group and the Kadanoff scaling picture. Physical Review B, 4(9), 3174–3183. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.4.3174

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct