Construct · 1 fields · 1 citations

why no socialism in America: a standalone construct

One name. One construct. A landmark on the map.

● anchor · a standalone construct Nearest construct by meaning·not indexed

A single standalone construct; nearby constructs are located against it in the Collider. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

History

the long debate over why the United States never developed a strong socialist or labor party, and the explanations offered.

In history, why no socialism in America refers to the long debate over why the United States never developed a strong socialist or labor party, and the explanations offered. This meaning comes from Foner (1984) in History Workshop Journal.[1]

Unit
Recovery means
Measured by

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how why no socialism in America sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in Collider Export BibTeX Report this entry

Nearby constructs

labor4 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, four constructs party2 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, two constructs

References

Foner, E. (1984). Why is there no Socialism in the United States? History Workshop Journal, 17(1), 57-80. https://doi.org/10.1093/hwj/17.1.57

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct