Construct · 2 fields · 3 citations

Where does anosmia collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, two constructs Nearest construct by meaning·not indexed
anosmia2 CONSTRUCTSSpecific anosmiaAMOORE · SPECIFICClinical anosmiaSMELL LOSS

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Olfactory science

Selective blindness to one odorant in an otherwise normal nose

Specific anosmia is a selective inability to detect a single odorant or odour class in a sense of smell that is otherwise normal, as some people cannot smell the “sweaty” steroid androstenone. Amoore’s 1967 and 1977 papers used such selective gaps as a probe into the olfactory code, hypothesising “primary odours” each tied to a receptor type. The referent is a selective perceptual gap and a research tool for mapping receptors, not a patient’s global loss of smell.[1][2]

Unit
A selective elevation of detection threshold for one odorant against normal overall smell
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Established by an odorant-specific detection threshold far above normal while thresholds for other odorants remain normal

Clinical medicine

Loss or absence of the sense of smell

In clinical medicine anosmia is the loss or absence of the sense of smell overall, whether from nasal obstruction, viral or traumatic damage, or neurodegeneration. Hummel and Welge-Lüssen’s Assessment of olfactory function describes how it is measured and graded as a sensory deficit. The referent is a global impairment of smelling, a symptom or diagnosis affecting a patient’s whole olfactory ability, not a selective gap for one molecule.[3]

Unit
The degree of loss of overall olfactory sensitivity
Recovery means
Some anosmia resolves as the cause clears (e.g., post-viral recovery); other cases are permanent; the label marks current loss, not necessarily permanence
Measured by
Quantified by standardised smell tests of threshold, discrimination and identification (e.g., Sniffin’ Sticks, UPSIT)

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how anosmia sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

retronasal olfaction1 fields · 1 citationsanchor · a single construct, one fieldclass3 fields · 3 citationsjingle · one word, three constructs

References

  1. Amoore, J. E. (1967). Specific anosmia: A clue to the olfactory code? Nature, 214(5093), 1095–1098. https://doi.org/10.1038/2141095a0
  2. Amoore, J. E. (1977). Specific anosmia and the concept of primary odors. Chemical Senses, 2(3), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/2.3.267
  3. Hummel, T., & Welge-Lüssen, A. (2006). Assessment of olfactory function. Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 63, 84–98. https://doi.org/10.1159/000093752

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct