Construct · 3 fields · 3 citations

Where does probe collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, three constructs Nearest construct by meaning·not indexed
probe3 CONSTRUCTSHash probingPETERSON · 1957Molecular probeGALL & PARDUE · 1969Interview probeWILLIS · PROBING

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Computer science

Checking successive slots for a key

In computer science, a probe is a single inspection of a slot in a hash table: under open addressing a key that collides is placed, or searched for, by probing a sequence of slots until an empty one or the key is found, so the probe count measures lookup cost. Peterson's 1957 Addressing for random-access storage analysed open addressing and the expected number of probes as a table fills. The referent is an access step in a data structure, quantified by the average probes per operation as a function of load factor, and it has nothing to do with a labelled molecule or an interviewer's follow-up question.[1]

Unit
The number of slot inspections (probes) per lookup or insertion
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Measured by the expected number of probes per operation as a function of the table's load factor

Molecular biology

A labelled strand that finds its match

In molecular biology, a probe is a labelled fragment of nucleic acid (or an antibody) that locates its complementary target by hybridising to it, so a known, tagged sequence is used to detect an unknown one in a blot, array, or tissue section. Gall and Pardue's 1969 Formation and detection of RNA-DNA hybrid molecules in cytological preparations demonstrated in situ hybridisation, using a labelled nucleic acid to reveal where a matching sequence lies. The referent is a tagged detection reagent defined by its complementarity to a target, measured by the signal where it binds, and it is unrelated to a hash-table inspection or a survey follow-up.[2]

Unit
The specific signal produced where the labelled probe binds its target
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Read by the labelled signal (radioactive, fluorescent, or enzymatic) at the site of hybridisation, against background

Survey methodology

A follow-up that draws out an answer

In survey and interview methodology, a probe is a neutral follow-up prompt an interviewer uses to clarify, expand, or complete a respondent's answer without leading it, and in cognitive interviewing probes are planned questions that reveal how respondents understand an item. Willis's Cognitive interviewing sets out concurrent and retrospective probing as a tool for diagnosing question problems. The referent is a verbal elicitation technique judged by whether it draws out usable, unbiased information, and it is a distinct construct from a labelled molecule or a hash-table access, sharing only the meaning of reaching in to find something.[3]

Unit
The additional or clarified response elicited by the follow-up prompt
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Evaluated by the completeness and clarity of the elicited response and by evidence of how the respondent interpreted the item

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how probe sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

collision3 fields · 7 citationsjingle · one word, three constructsblot2 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, two constructstarget4 fields · 6 citationsjingle · one word, four constructs

References

  1. Peterson, W. W. (1957). Addressing for random-access storage. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 1(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1147/rd.12.0130
  2. Gall, J. G., & Pardue, M. L. (1969). Formation and detection of RNA-DNA hybrid molecules in cytological preparations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 63(2), 378–383. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.63.2.378
  3. Willis, G. B. (2005). Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design. Sage Publications. ISBN 9780761928041

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct