Construct · 3 fields · 7 citations
One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.
● jingle · one word, three constructs Nearest construct by meaningimpactcompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to collision is impact.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
In mechanics, a collision is a brief interaction in which two or more bodies exert large forces on each other over a short time, exchanging momentum and, depending on the case, kinetic energy: an elastic collision conserves kinetic energy while an inelastic one converts some of it to heat or deformation. Descartes gave the first systematic rules of impact in his Principia philosophiae (1644), though most were later shown to be wrong; Wallis, Wren, and Huygens established the correct conservation results in papers read to the Royal Society in 1668 and 1669, and Newton codified them in the Principia (1687). The referent here is a physical event between masses, measured in units of momentum and energy, and it has nothing in common with two words that sound alike, two ships that strike at sea, or two keys that land in one table slot beyond the shared name.[1][2][3]
In historical linguistics, a homonymic collision is what happens when regular sound change drives two etymologically distinct words into the same form, so that one shape now carries two meanings and communication suffers. Gilliéron described the classic case in his Pathologie et thérapeutique verbales (1921): in Gascon dialects the Latin words cattus (cat) and gallus (rooster) both became gat, and speakers repaired the clash by replacing the word for rooster with a substitute; Williams's The conflict of homonyms in English (1944) traced the same pressure through English. The referent is a collision of word forms in a speech community, tracked across dialect maps and centuries, and it is unrelated to colliding bodies, colliding ships, or colliding hash keys.[4][5]
In computer science, a hash collision occurs when a hash function maps two different keys to the same slot or output value, which any hash table must detect and resolve. Peterson's Addressing for random-access storage (1957) analysed the overflow problem that arises when records compete for the same address and set out the probing methods that handle it; Knuth's The art of computer programming, Volume 3 (1973) standardised the modern treatment, including chaining and open addressing. The referent is a coincidence of computed addresses inside a data structure, counted by collision rate and load factor, and it bears no relation to two bodies striking, two ships meeting, or two words merging in sound.[6][7]
Next
See how collision sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct