Construct · 3 fields · 7 citations

Where does interaction collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, three constructs Nearest construct by meaninggravitycompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to interaction is gravity.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

interaction3 CONSTRUCTSFundamental forceNEWTON · MUTUAL FORCESocial interactionSIMMEL · WECHSELWIRKUNGInteraction effectFISHER · ANOVA EFFECT

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Physics

A fundamental force between bodies

Newton's 1687 Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica set out that bodies act on one another with mutual force, gravitation drawing every mass toward every other and every action met by an equal and opposite reaction, and this is the origin of the physical idea that particles influence each other. Modern physics groups these influences into the fundamental interactions, gravitational, electromagnetic, strong, and weak, and Weinberg's 1967 A Model of Leptons unified two of them into a single electroweak account. Here the referent is a force in nature that changes how matter and energy move, measured in the laboratory and the sky, and it is not a reciprocal action between people or a statistical effect of one factor upon another.[1][2]

Unit
A force between two bodies or fields, given in newtons or as a coupling strength
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Inferred from how bodies accelerate or scatter, and from the rates of decays and reactions recorded in detectors

Sociology

Reciprocal action between people

Simmel's 1908 Soziologie made reciprocal action between people, which he called Wechselwirkung, the basic subject matter of the discipline, arguing that society exists in the countless exchanges through which individuals affect one another. Mead's 1934 Mind, Self and Society traced how the self and shared meaning arise in this exchange, and Blumer's 1969 Symbolic Interactionism named the resulting school and held that people act toward things on the basis of meanings worked out between them. Here the referent is the meeting of persons who interpret and respond to each other, studied through observation and conversation, and it is not a force between particles or the joint effect of two factors in an experiment.[3][4][5]

Unit
A single episode of people acting toward and interpreting one another
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Studied through direct observation, recorded conversation, and coding of what people do and say together

Statistics

When one factor's effect depends on another

Fisher and Mackenzie's 1923 Studies in Crop Variation II introduced the word interaction to describe a joint effect that plain averaging misses: the response to one treatment differed depending on the potato variety it was applied to, so the two factors could not simply be added together. Fisher's 1935 The Design of Experiments then built the factorial designs and analysis of variance that isolate such effects and test them. Here the referent is a statistical quantity, the part of an outcome that appears only when the levels of two or more factors are combined, estimated from data, and it is not a physical force or a social encounter.[6][7]

Unit
The extra part of an outcome present only when factor levels are combined
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Estimated as an interaction term in analysis of variance or regression and tested for significance

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how interaction sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

force5 fields · 9 citationsjingle · one word, five constructsaction3 fields · 6 citationsjingle · one word, three constructsreciprocity5 fields · 5 citationsjingle · one word, five constructs

References

  1. Newton, I. (1687). Philosophiæ naturalis principia mathematica. Josephi Streater.
  2. Weinberg, S. (1967). A model of leptons. Physical Review Letters, 19(21), 1264–1266. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.19.1264
  3. Simmel, G. (1908). Soziologie: Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung. Duncker & Humblot.
  4. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 9780226516677
  5. Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Prentice-Hall.
  6. Fisher, R. A., & Mackenzie, W. A. (1923). Studies in crop variation. II. The manurial response of different potato varieties. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 13(3), 311–320. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600003592
  7. Fisher, R. A. (1935). The design of experiments. Oliver & Boyd.

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct