Construct · 3 fields · 7 citations
One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.
● jingle · one word, three constructs Nearest construct by meaninggravitycompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to interaction is gravity.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
Newton's 1687 Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica set out that bodies act on one another with mutual force, gravitation drawing every mass toward every other and every action met by an equal and opposite reaction, and this is the origin of the physical idea that particles influence each other. Modern physics groups these influences into the fundamental interactions, gravitational, electromagnetic, strong, and weak, and Weinberg's 1967 A Model of Leptons unified two of them into a single electroweak account. Here the referent is a force in nature that changes how matter and energy move, measured in the laboratory and the sky, and it is not a reciprocal action between people or a statistical effect of one factor upon another.[1][2]
Simmel's 1908 Soziologie made reciprocal action between people, which he called Wechselwirkung, the basic subject matter of the discipline, arguing that society exists in the countless exchanges through which individuals affect one another. Mead's 1934 Mind, Self and Society traced how the self and shared meaning arise in this exchange, and Blumer's 1969 Symbolic Interactionism named the resulting school and held that people act toward things on the basis of meanings worked out between them. Here the referent is the meeting of persons who interpret and respond to each other, studied through observation and conversation, and it is not a force between particles or the joint effect of two factors in an experiment.[3][4][5]
Fisher and Mackenzie's 1923 Studies in Crop Variation II introduced the word interaction to describe a joint effect that plain averaging misses: the response to one treatment differed depending on the potato variety it was applied to, so the two factors could not simply be added together. Fisher's 1935 The Design of Experiments then built the factorial designs and analysis of variance that isolate such effects and test them. Here the referent is a statistical quantity, the part of an outcome that appears only when the levels of two or more factors are combined, estimated from data, and it is not a physical force or a social encounter.[6][7]
Next
See how interaction sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct