Construct · 4 fields · 4 citations
One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.
● jingle · one word, four constructs Nearest construct by meaningmasscompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to quantity is mass.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
In antiquity, Aristotle made quantity (Greek poson, 'how much') one of the ten basic categories of being set out in his Categories (ch. 6): a fundamental way a thing can be said to exist, alongside substance, quality, relation, and the rest. He divided it into discrete quantity, such as number and spoken sound, and continuous quantity, such as a line, a surface, a solid, time, and place, and held that quantity alone has no contrary and admits no degree. In this meaning quantity is a mode of being that a thing has, a kind of predicate within a scheme of categories. This is not the length of a vowel in speech, the reach of a logical statement, or the mass of a physical body, but a category under which such amounts fall.[1]
Also in antiquity, Aristotle distinguished statements by whether they speak of all, of some, or of a single subject, in On Interpretation (ch. 7) and the Prior Analytics. Later logicians named this feature the quantity of a proposition, universal ('all S are P') or particular ('some S are P'), and paired it with quality, which is whether the proposition affirms or denies. In this meaning quantity is a property of a judgment, the extent of the subject term it ranges over, and not a count of things. It has nothing to do with a category of being, the duration of a spoken sound, or the mass of an object, though the same word names all of them.[2]
Isaac Newton opened the Principia (1687) by defining the quantity of matter as 'the measure of the same, arising from its density and bulk conjointly', the property now called mass. In this meaning quantity is not a bare amount but a specific measured magnitude of a body: the mass that resists acceleration and fixes the body's weight in a given gravitational field. Newton's definition became the foundation of classical mechanics and of the modern treatment of mass. This referent is a physical property of matter, measured in kilograms, and it is unrelated to a category of being, the reach of a logical statement, or the length of a spoken vowel.[3]
Nikolai Trubetzkoy's Grundzüge der Phonologie (1939) treated quantity, the distinctive duration or length of a vowel or consonant, as a phonological property that can tell words apart, building on the long and short syllables that ancient Greek and Latin verse had already counted as quantity. In languages such as Finnish, Latin, and classical Greek, a long vowel and a short vowel with the same articulation form different words, so quantity here is contrastive length in relative time. In this meaning quantity is a durational feature of a speech sound, not an amount of anything countable. It is not Aristotle's category of being, the universal or particular reach of a proposition, or Newton's measure of mass.[4]
Next
See how quantity sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct