Construct · 4 fields · 4 citations

Where does duration collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, four constructs Nearest construct by meaningshortcompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to duration is short.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

duration4 CONSTRUCTSBond durationMACAULAY · BOND TIMEMusical durationSEASHORE · NOTE LENGTHPhonetic durationPETERSON · VOWEL LENGTHPerceived durationKAHNEMAN · FELT TIME

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Finance

A bond's interest-rate sensitivity

The weighted-average time to receive a bond's promised payments, with each payment weighted by its present value, and, in its modified form, the resulting sensitivity of the bond's price to a small change in interest rates. Macaulay's 1938 Some Theoretical Problems Suggested by the Movements of Interest Rates, Bond Yields and Stock Prices in the United States Since 1856 introduced this weighted-average measure, now called Macaulay duration, to capture a bond's effective life better than its maturity date alone. The referent is a property of a stream of future payments, quoted in years but really a gauge of price risk, and it has nothing to do with how long a note sounds, how long a spoken vowel lasts, or how long an experience feels.[1]

Unit
A present-value-weighted time in years, or a percentage price change per unit of yield
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Computed from a bond's cash flows and yield as the present-value-weighted average of payment times, then modified to a price sensitivity

Music

How long a note sounds

The length of time a musical tone or rest lasts, one of the basic attributes of a tone alongside pitch, loudness, and timbre; in notation it is written as relative note values, such as whole, half, and quarter notes, that are realised in real time against a chosen tempo. Seashore's 1938 Psychology of Music treated duration as the time attribute of tone, one of the measurable dimensions of every musical sound. The referent is the temporal extent of a sounded note, scaled to a beat rather than to a fixed clock, and it is distinct from a bond's price risk, the millisecond length of a speech sound, or a listener's felt passage of time.[2]

Unit
The time a note or rest is held, as a relative note value against a tempo
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Read from notated note values and tempo, or timed in seconds between a note's onset and offset in a performance

Phonetics and linguistics

The length of a speech sound

The measured length in time of a speech sound, such as a vowel or consonant, treated as an acoustic property that shifts with context and can itself tell words apart in languages that use contrastive length. Peterson and Lehiste's 1960 Duration of Syllable Nuclei in English measured how the length of stressed vowels in English depends on the surrounding consonants and identified an intrinsic length for each vowel. The referent is a physical interval of speech, read in milliseconds from a recording, and it is not a note's held length, a bond's sensitivity to interest rates, or the subjective stretch of remembered time.[3]

Unit
The time a speech segment occupies, in milliseconds
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Segmented from a spectrogram or waveform and measured in milliseconds between the onset and offset of the sound

Psychology

How long an interval feels

The subjectively experienced or remembered length of an interval or episode, which can diverge sharply from its clock time; in looking back on an experience, its total length often counts for little next to its most intense moment and its ending. Fredrickson and Kahneman's 1993 Duration Neglect in Retrospective Evaluations of Affective Episodes showed that people's overall evaluation of an emotional episode barely tracked how long it lasted, a pattern they named duration neglect. The referent is a felt or judged quantity in the mind, studied through estimates and evaluations rather than a stopwatch, and it differs from a note's length, a vowel's length, or a bond's price sensitivity.[4]

Unit
A judged or estimated length of experienced time, relative to felt intensity
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Elicited through duration estimates, reproductions, or retrospective ratings and compared against actual clock time

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how duration sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

pitch3 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, three constructsbond2 fields · 2 citationsjingle · one word, two constructsconvexity4 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, four constructs (two share a mathematical root)

References

  1. Macaulay, F. R. (1938). Some theoretical problems suggested by the movements of interest rates, bond yields and stock prices in the United States since 1856. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  2. Seashore, C. E. (1938). Psychology of music. McGraw-Hill.
  3. Peterson, G. E., & Lehiste, I. (1960). Duration of syllable nuclei in English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 32(6), 693–703. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1908183
  4. Fredrickson, B. L., & Kahneman, D. (1993). Duration neglect in retrospective evaluations of affective episodes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.45

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct