Construct · 4 fields · 4 citations

Where does convexity collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, four constructs (two share a mathematical root) Nearest construct by meaningcurvaturecompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to convexity is curvature.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

convexity4 CONSTRUCTSConvex bodySCHNEIDER · CONVEX BODYConvex functionROCKAFELLAR · CONVEXITYBond convexityDUNETZ · BOND CURVATUREConvex preferencesARROW-DEBREU · AVERAGES

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Geometry

A solid shape with no dents

In geometry, convexity is the property of a set that contains, for every two of its points, the whole straight segment joining them, so a convex body is a solid shape with no dents, notches, or holes: a ball, a cube, and a lens are convex, while a star and a crescent are not. Schneider's 2013 Convex Bodies: The Brunn-Minkowski Theory is the standard modern treatment of such bodies and of their volumes, surfaces, and mixed measures. Here the referent is a shape sitting in space, described by its boundary and volume, not a curving cost function to be minimised, a bond's price curvature, or an assumption about a shopper's tastes.[1]

Unit
A convex set or body in space, given by its points and its boundary
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Characterised by volume, surface area, width, and mixed volumes, and built as the convex hull of a set of points

Optimization and analysis

a function whose graph cups upward, so any local low point is also a global minimum.

In optimization and analysis, convexity is the property of a function whose graph cups upward, so the straight line between any two points on the graph never dips below it: this is exactly the condition, stated formally by Jensen's inequality, that makes any local low point a global minimum and lets a problem be solved reliably. Rockafellar's 1970 Convex Analysis is the founding systematic account of convex functions and sets and the calculus of subgradients and duality built on them. Here the referent is an algebraic property of a function or feasible region that guarantees tractable minimisation, not a solid shape studied for its volume, a bond's price curvature, or a preference axiom.[2]

Unit
A convex function or convex feasible set, as a mathematical property
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Checked from the definition or a nonnegative second derivative (a curvature matrix that is never negative), and exploited by convex optimisation algorithms

Fixed-income finance

A bond's price-yield curvature

In fixed-income finance, convexity is the curvature of the relationship between a bond's price and its yield: duration gives the straight-line, first-order guess at how the price moves when yields change, and convexity is the second-order correction that captures how that price sensitivity itself changes, so a bond with high positive convexity gains more when yields fall than it loses when they rise. Dunetz and Mahoney's 1988 study Using Duration and Convexity in the Analysis of Callable Bonds showed how the measure is applied and how an embedded call option can drive convexity negative. Here the referent is a number pinned to one specific price-yield curve, quoted alongside duration, not a shape in space, a general property of a cost function, or a claim about consumer tastes.[3]

Unit
One bond's price-yield curvature, a number quoted with its duration
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Computed as the second derivative of price with respect to yield, scaled by price, from the bond's cash flows

Microeconomics

an assumption on preferences that a blend of two acceptable bundles is at least as good as either extreme.

In microeconomics, convexity is an assumption placed on a person's preferences: if a shopper is content to accept either of two different bundles of goods, then a blend of the two, an average, is at least as good as either extreme, which yields smooth, bowed-in indifference curves and a taste for variety. Arrow and Debreu's 1954 Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy made convexity of preferences and of production sets a load-bearing assumption in the proof that a competitive market has an equilibrium. Here the referent is a behavioural axiom about how choices rank, tested against observed demand, not a solid shape, a property of a cost function, or a bond's price curvature.[4]

Unit
An axiom on a preference ordering: an average weakly beats the extremes
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Expressed as convex upper-contour sets, or bowed-in indifference curves, and probed with revealed-preference and demand data

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how convexity sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

equilibrium4 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, four constructselasticity3 fields · 7 citationsjingle · one word, three sciencesgradient4 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, four constructs

References

  1. Schneider, R. (2013). Convex bodies: The Brunn-Minkowski theory (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139003858
  2. Rockafellar, R. T. (1970). Convex analysis. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400873173
  3. Dunetz, M. L., & Mahoney, J. M. (1988). Using duration and convexity in the analysis of callable bonds. Financial Analysts Journal, 44(3), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v44.n3.53
  4. Arrow, K. J., & Debreu, G. (1954). Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy. Econometrica, 22(3), 265–290. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907353

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct