Construct · 4 fields · 4 citations

Where does capture collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, four constructs Nearest construct by meaningregulationcompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to capture is regulation.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

capture4 CONSTRUCTSRegulatory captureSTIGLER · AGENCY CAPTUREElectron captureALVAREZ · ORBITAL ELECTRONCapture-recaptureJOLLY · MARK AND RECAPTUREVariable captureLANDIN · CLOSURE SCOPE

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Political economy

An agency serving the industry it regulates

Regulatory capture is the process by which an agency set up to regulate an industry in the public interest comes instead to act mainly in the interest of the firms it oversees. Stigler's 1971 The Theory of Economic Regulation argued that regulation is often acquired by an industry and designed and run primarily for its benefit, because concentrated producers can organise to demand favourable rules while a dispersed public cannot. The referent is a shift in whose interest a public body serves, read from the rules and outcomes it produces, and it has nothing to do with a nucleus absorbing a particle, a marked animal caught a second time, or a variable held by a piece of code.[1]

Unit
One agency's drift from public to industry interest, read from the rules it makes
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Inferred from whose interests a body's rules and enforcement favour, and from the movement of staff and benefits between the regulator and the regulated

Nuclear physics

A nucleus absorbing a particle

In nuclear physics, capture is the absorption of a particle by an atomic nucleus. In electron capture the nucleus draws in one of its own inner orbital electrons, turning a proton into a neutron and emitting a neutrino; in neutron capture a free neutron is absorbed and the excited nucleus usually sheds the extra energy as a gamma ray. Alvarez's 1938 The Capture of Orbital Electrons by Nuclei gave the first clear experimental demonstration of the electron-capture decay mode. The referent is an absorption event inside an atom, counted as a decay rate or a reaction cross section, and it is not an agency serving an industry, a tagged animal recaught in a trap, or a name bound inside a function.[2]

Unit
One event in which a nucleus absorbs a particle, such as an inner electron or a neutron
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Detected through the emitted X-rays, gamma rays, or neutrinos, and quantified as a decay rate or a capture cross section

Ecology and biostatistics

Estimating a population by marking and recatching

Capture-recapture is a method for estimating the size of an animal population that cannot be counted directly: a sample of individuals is captured, marked, and released, and the fraction of marked animals in a later sample is used to infer the total. Jolly's 1965 Explicit estimates from capture-recapture data with both death and immigration-stochastic model set out a model that estimates abundance and survival even as animals are born, die, and move between catches. The referent is a statistical estimate of how many animals live in an area, reported as a count with error bounds, and it is unrelated to a regulator serving an industry, a nucleus absorbing an electron, or a variable held by a closure.[3]

Unit
One estimated population total, built from marked and recaptured samples
Recovery means
The method turns on recatching marked individuals, whose ratio to the unmarked yields the estimate
Measured by
Computed from the ratio of marked to unmarked animals across successive capture occasions, using a model such as Jolly-Seber

Computer science

A closure retaining variables from its scope

Variable capture is the way a function value, or closure, keeps a reference to variables from the scope in which it was created, so it can still read or change them when it runs later somewhere else. Landin's 1964 The Mechanical Evaluation of Expressions introduced the closure as an expression paired with the environment that binds its free variables, formalising how a nested function holds on to the names around it. The referent is a binding kept by a piece of code, found by tracing which names a function reads, and it is not an industry taking over its regulator, a nucleus taking in an electron, or a trap recatching a marked animal.[4]

Unit
One binding a closure holds to a variable in its enclosing scope
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Identified by analysing which free variables a function references and how they are stored in its closure environment

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how capture sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

absorption6 fields · 6 citationsjingle · one word, six constructsclosure6 fields · 6 citationsjingle · one word, six constructsmonopoly2 fields · 2 citationsjingle · one word, two constructs

References

  1. Stigler, G. J. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003160
  2. Alvarez, L. W. (1938). The capture of orbital electrons by nuclei. Physical Review, 54(7), 486–497. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.54.486
  3. Jolly, G. M. (1965). Explicit estimates from capture-recapture data with both death and immigration-stochastic model. Biometrika, 52(1-2), 225–247. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/52.1-2.225
  4. Landin, P. J. (1964). The mechanical evaluation of expressions. The Computer Journal, 6(4), 308–320. https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/6.4.308

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct