Construct · 2 fields · 2 citations
One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.
● jingle · one word, two constructs Nearest construct by meaningbindingcompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to scope is binding.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
In logic and the study of meaning, the scope of an operator, quantifier, or negation is the part of an expression over which it takes effect and which it controls. When a sentence like every student did not pass can be read two ways, the readings differ only in whether every or not governs the other, that is, in their relative scope. Szabolcsi's 2010 Quantification surveys how the scope of quantifiers is assigned across languages and why one string of words can carry several meanings. The referent here is an abstract relation of control between parts of an expression, not a region of running code, the agreed boundary of a project, or a viewing instrument.[1]
In a programming language, the scope of a name is the region of the program in which that name refers to a particular binding and can be used to reach it. Under lexical, also called static, scope the region is fixed by where the name is written, nested block within nested block, while under dynamic scope it depends on the order in which code runs. Landin's 1964 The Mechanical Evaluation of Expressions introduced the environment, the structure that binds names to values and fixes where each binding is visible, which underlies the modern lexical account of scope. The referent is a region of a program where a name is valid, not a control relation in a sentence, a project's boundary of work, or an optical instrument.[2]
Next
See how scope sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct