Construct · 4 fields · 8 citations
One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.
● jingle · one word, four constructs Nearest construct by meaningaccidentalcompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to error is accidental.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
In law, error names a mistake made by a court in a legal proceeding, which a higher court may review and, if the mistake changed the outcome, set aside. The old common-law writ of error, described in William Blackstone's 1768 Commentaries on the Laws of England, let a party ask an appellate court to examine the record of a lower court for legal mistakes and reverse the judgment. Modern practice sorts such mistakes by their effect, and Roger Traynor's 1970 The Riddle of Harmless Error examined how courts separate a harmless error from a reversible one. This referent is a defect in a judicial proceeding, judged by whether it affected the verdict, not a deviation of a measurement from a model, a signal that steers a machine, or a lapse in a person's action.[1][2]
In statistics, the error is the amount by which an observed value departs from the value a model predicts or from the true quantity being estimated, treated as an unavoidable random component rather than a blunder. Adrien-Marie Legendre's 1805 Nouvelles methodes pour la determination des orbites des cometes introduced the method of least squares, which fits a model by making the sum of the squared errors as small as possible. Carl Friedrich Gauss's 1809 Theoria motus corporum coelestium then gave a probabilistic theory of these observational errors and the bell-shaped curve that describes how they scatter. This referent is a numerical residual attached to a measurement or a fitted equation, carrying no notion of blame, unlike a court's reviewable mistake, the signal that drives a controller, or a slip made by a human operator.[3][4]
In control engineering, the error is the difference between the value a system is commanded to reach and the value it actually has, and a feedback controller acts on that difference to reduce it. James Clerk Maxwell's 1868 On governors gave the first mathematical analysis of such feedback, studying how a governor counteracts the deviation of a machine's speed from the desired speed. Harry Nyquist's 1932 Regeneration theory then established when a feedback loop that keeps correcting this deviation stays stable rather than breaking into oscillation. This referent is a live signal inside a running machine, continuously computed and driven toward zero, not a residual left after fitting data, a judicial mistake, or a failure of human action.[5][6]
In human factors and psychology, human error is an action or decision that fails to achieve its intended outcome and was not caused by chance, studied so that systems can be designed to prevent or tolerate it. Paul Fitts and Richard Jones's 1947 analysis of 460 pilot-error incidents in aircraft controls traced many mistakes to confusing instrument and control layouts rather than to careless operators, founding the study of error as a design problem. James Reason's 1990 Human Error then set out the influential division of errors into slips, lapses, and mistakes, tied to different stages of planning and action. This referent is a shortfall in what a person intended to do, analysed to improve people and equipment, not a random residual, a court's reviewable mistake, or a signal steering a machine.[7][8]
Next
See how error sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct