Construct · 4 fields · 7 citations

Where does defect collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, four constructs Nearest construct by meaningdislocationcompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to defect is dislocation.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

defect4 CONSTRUCTSProduct defectMACPHERSON · DEFECTCrystal defectFRENKEL · LATTICE VACANCYDefect strategyFLOOD · DEFECT STRATEGYDefectWRIGHT · SOCIOLOGY OF RELIGION

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Law (products liability)

A product deficiency that triggers liability

In products liability, a defect is a condition in which a product departs from what a reasonable buyer is entitled to expect, whether from a flaw in how one unit was made, a choice in how the whole line was designed, or a missing warning, and its presence can make the seller answerable for harm the product causes. MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co. (1916) held that a maker owes a duty of care to the eventual user of a defectively built product even with no direct contract between them, and the American Law Institute's Restatement (Second) of Torts section 402A (1965) later placed strict liability on one who sells a product in a defective condition that is unreasonably dangerous. The referent is a legal judgment about a marketed good and the duty it carries, not a missing atom in a crystal or a choice to betray a partner in a game.[1][2]

Unit
One product condition judged defective, per claim or product line
Recovery means
A defect may be cured by recall, redesign, or an added warning
Measured by
Established at trial by evidence that the product departed from its intended design, from its sibling units, or from a safer feasible alternative

Materials science and solid-state physics

A break in a crystal lattice

In a crystalline solid, a defect is a place where the regular repeating arrangement of atoms is broken: a missing atom at a site (a vacancy), an extra atom squeezed between sites (an interstitial), or a line along which whole planes of atoms are displaced (a dislocation). Frenkel's 1926 Über die Wärmebewegung in festen und flüssigen Körpern proposed that thermal motion leaves vacant sites and interstitial atoms scattered through a lattice, and Taylor's 1934 theory of plastic deformation showed that moving dislocations let real crystals bend far more easily than a flawless lattice ever could. The referent is a physical irregularity in an atomic lattice, counted by how many occur in a given volume, not a legal fault in a sold product or a strategic move against a partner.[3][4]

Unit
One lattice irregularity (a vacancy, interstitial, or dislocation), reported as defects per unit volume or dislocation length per volume
Recovery means
Annealing lets atoms migrate so vacancies and dislocations are reduced
Measured by
Imaged by transmission electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction, and inferred from electrical, mechanical, and diffusion behaviour

Game theory

The self-serving move against cooperation

In the prisoner's dilemma and related games, to defect is to take the self-serving action that pays better than cooperating whatever the other player does, even though both defecting leaves the pair worse off than both cooperating would. The game was devised by Merrill Flood and Melvin Dresher at RAND in 1950 and reported in Flood's 1958 Some experimental games, and Axelrod and Hamilton's 1981 The evolution of cooperation examined when defection or cooperation prevails across repeated play among biological and human agents. The referent is a labelled choice inside a formal payoff structure, scored in utility, not a flaw in a crystal or a deficiency in a sold product.[5][6]

Unit
One player's chosen action (defect or cooperate) in a single round, scored by its payoff
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Recorded as the action chosen and its payoff, and summarised over repeated rounds as a rate of defection

Sociology of religion

leaving a new religious movement, studied as a process of disengagement from a high-commitment group.

In sociology of religion, defect refers to leaving a new religious movement, studied as a process of disengagement from a high-commitment group. This meaning comes from Wright (1987) in Leaving cults.[7]

Unit
Recovery means
Measured by

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how defect sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

cooperation4 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, four constructsliability2 fields · 2 citationsjingle · one word, two constructsnegligence5 fields · 11 citationsjingle · one word, five constructs

References

  1. MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co., 217 N.Y. 382, 111 N.E. 1050 (1916).
  2. American Law Institute. (1965). Restatement (Second) of Torts (§ 402A). American Law Institute.
  3. Frenkel, J. (1926). Über die Wärmebewegung in festen und flüssigen Körpern. Zeitschrift für Physik, 35(8), 652–669. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01379812
  4. Taylor, G. I. (1934). The mechanism of plastic deformation of crystals. Part I. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, 145(855), 362–387. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1934.0106
  5. Flood, M. M. (1958). Some experimental games. Management Science, 5(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.5.1.5
  6. Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981). The evolution of cooperation. Science, 211(4489), 1390–1396. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7466396
  7. Wright, S. A. (1987). Leaving cults. Society for the Scientific Study of Religion. ISBN 9780932566065

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct