Construct · 4 fields · 6 citations
One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.
● jingle · one word, four sciences Nearest construct by meaningyieldcompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to plasticity is yield.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
The nervous system's capacity to change its structure and function with experience, from the strengthening of a single synapse to the remapping of a cortical area after injury. Hebb proposed in 1949 that when one cell repeatedly takes part in firing another, the connection between them grows more efficient, a postulate later compressed to "cells that fire together wire together." Bliss and Lomo gave it a physiological handle in 1973 with long-term potentiation: a brief high-frequency train to the perforant path left the dentate synapses more responsive for hours or days. The change is use-dependent and, importantly, not one-way, since the same machinery that potentiates a synapse can depress it. Plasticity here names a capacity to re-encode, not a single fixed alteration.[1][2]
The permanent, non-recoverable deformation a solid undergoes when stressed beyond its yield point, as distinct from the elastic strain that springs back once the load is removed. Below the yield point a metal behaves elastically; above it the material flows and keeps the new shape. Taylor argued in 1934 that this flow is carried by dislocations, line defects in the crystal lattice that move under stress and let planes of atoms slip past one another a step at a time, which is why real crystals yield at a fraction of the stress a perfect lattice would require. Plasticity here is defined by what does not come back: the strain that remains after unloading. It is the exact opposite of the neuroscientist's meaning, where reversibility is the whole point.[3]
The capacity of a single genotype to produce different phenotypes depending on the environment it develops in, treated as a property of the genotype rather than of any one individual. Bradshaw set out its evolutionary significance in 1965, arguing that plasticity is itself a character under genetic control and specific to particular traits, so that one feature of a plant may be highly plastic while another is buffered against the same variation. The pattern of phenotypes a genotype yields across a range of environments is its reaction norm. West-Eberhard's 2003 synthesis placed developmental plasticity at the centre of evolution, arguing that environmentally induced variants can precede and bias the genetic changes that follow. The referent is a genotype's response across environments, not experience written into nervous tissue and not stress written into a lattice.[4][5]
The within-person modifiability of psychological functioning across the life course, treated as a defining feature of human development rather than a fixed endowment. Baltes made plasticity a central proposition of life-span developmental psychology in 1987: at any age a person's course of development is one of several that were possible, and the range that intervention or training can recover is itself the object of study. Evidence comes from showing that measured abilities move under altered conditions, for instance that older adults regain fluid-ability performance after practice. The claim is about intraindividual change and its limits, so the unit is one developing person over time. That separates it from the genotype of the phenotypic meaning and from the tissue of the neural meaning, even where the underlying biology overlaps.[6]
Next
See how plasticity sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct