Construct · 3 fields · 3 citations
One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.
● jingle · one word, three constructs Nearest construct by meaningcyclecompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to path is cycle.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
In graph theory a path is a walk through a graph that visits a sequence of vertices joined by edges and never repeats a vertex. Bondy and Murty, in Graph Theory with Applications, build the term up from a walk, a sequence of vertices and edges; a trail is a walk with no repeated edge, and a path is a trail with no repeated vertex, so it cannot cross itself or loop back. The referent is a subgraph, a finite object made of specific vertices and edges, and its unit is that ordered list of distinct vertices from a start to an end. What defines it is the no-repeat rule, which is why a path of length two has two edges and three vertices and no more. It is not a location and not a probability; it is a piece of a graph, and questions about it, such as whether two vertices are joined by a path or what the shortest one is, are settled by the structure alone.[1]
In path analysis and structural equation modeling a path is a hypothesized directed causal link from one variable to another, drawn as an arrow in a diagram and carrying a path coefficient that measures the strength of the effect. Wright's 1934 The method of path coefficients showed how a system of such coefficients, estimated from correlations, decomposes an observed association into direct and indirect effects that travel along the arrows. The referent is a claim about how one variable influences another, not an object in a picture, and its unit is a standardized coefficient attached to a specified direction. What defines it is the causal commitment: reversing the arrow makes a different model, and the coefficient is meaningless without it. It shares the word and even the branching diagram with a graph path, but here an edge is an assertion about cause that the data can support or undermine, not a mere connection.[2]
In the path-integral formulation of quantum mechanics a path is one possible history of a system, a complete trajectory from a starting point to an ending point, and the amplitude for the system to go from one to the other is a sum over every such path. Feynman set this out in 1948, giving each path a phase and adding the contributions of all of them, so that no single trajectory is the answer and even paths a classical particle would never take contribute. The referent is a conceivable history in a continuous infinity of them, and its unit is a trajectory weighted by a phase. What defines it is that the path is summed over, not chosen: the physics lives in the interference among all paths, and the familiar classical route emerges only as the one where nearby paths add in step. It shares the word with a graph path and a route through space, but here a path is a term in a sum, not a thing selected or traversed.[3]
Next
See how path sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct