Construct · 4 fields · 5 citations

Where does interference collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, four unrelated constructs Nearest construct by meaningaccidentcompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to interference is accident.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

interference4 CONSTRUCTSWave interferenceYOUNG · TWO-SLIT FRINGESMemory interferenceUNDERWOOD · MEMORY BLOCKSignal interferenceANDREWS · CO-CHANNEL SIRTort interferencePERLMAN · CONTRACT TORT

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Optics and wave physics

the reinforcement and cancellation when coherent waves overlap and their amplitudes add, producing fixed bright and dark fringes.

The reinforcement and cancellation that arise when two or more coherent waves overlap and their amplitudes add point by point: where crest meets crest the disturbance grows (constructive interference), and where crest meets trough it vanishes (destructive interference), leaving a fixed pattern of bright and dark fringes. Young's 1804 Bakerian Lecture on physical optics used the two-slit experiment to show that light superposes in exactly this way, evidence for its wave nature and the foundation of later interferometry. The referent is a physical superposition of waves in a medium or field, read as a fringe pattern, not a lapse of memory, a corrupted transmission, or a wrongful act in commerce.[1]

Unit
A fringe pattern produced by superposed coherent waves
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Observed as fringe spacing and visibility, and exploited in interferometers to measure path differences to a fraction of a wavelength

Cognitive psychology

impaired learning or recall when one set of memories or responses competes with another.

The impairment of learning or recall that occurs when one set of memories competes with another: in proactive interference earlier learning intrudes on newer material, in retroactive interference later learning degrades what came before, and in response interference an automatic response competes with the one the task demands. Underwood's 1957 Interference and forgetting argued that most forgetting observed in the laboratory reflects such competition rather than simple decay, and Stroop's 1935 studies showed a reading response interfering with colour naming. The referent is a cognitive competition between traces or responses inside one mind, indexed by errors and slowed retrieval, not overlapping light waves, unwanted energy in a channel, or a tort.[2][3]

Unit
Lost or slowed recall caused by competing memories or responses
Recovery means
Retrieval can recover once the competing trace is suppressed or the interfering context is removed
Measured by
Indexed by recall accuracy, intrusion errors, and reaction-time costs in paired-associate and Stroop tasks

Telecommunications engineering

Unwanted energy degrading a signal

Unwanted electromagnetic or radio energy that adds to a wanted signal and degrades a receiver's ability to recover it: it spans electromagnetic interference from other devices and co-channel interference from transmitters sharing a frequency, and its severity is captured by the signal-to-interference ratio. Andrews, Baccelli, and Ganti's 2011 model of cellular coverage treats a network as interference limited, deriving coverage from the statistics of the interfering transmitters rather than from thermal noise alone. The referent is a nuisance quantity in an engineered channel, something to be suppressed or planned around, unlike the exploited fringe pattern of optics, the memory competition of psychology, or the commercial tort of law.[4]

Unit
Unwanted channel energy, expressed as a signal-to-interference ratio
Recovery means
Mitigated by filtering, shielding, frequency planning, and interference cancellation, rather than truly reversed
Measured by
Quantified by the signal-to-interference or signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio and by bit or packet error rates

Tort law

Disrupting another's contract or business

The tort committed when a person intentionally and improperly disrupts another's existing contract or prospective economic relationship, for example by inducing a third party to breach a contract or by wrongfully driving off a competitor's expected custom. Perlman's 1982 analysis in the University of Chicago Law Review traced how this family of wrongs, interference with contract and with prospective advantage, sits uneasily between tort and contract doctrine and turns on what counts as improper conduct. The referent is a legal wrong defined by intent and justification and remedied by damages, sharing nothing with superposed waves, competing memories, or channel noise beyond the word itself.[5]

Unit
A legal wrong of intentionally disrupting a contract or business expectancy
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Established in litigation by proof of a valid relationship, the defendant's knowledge and intent, improper conduct, causation, and resulting damages

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how interference sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

fringe2 fields · 2 citationsjingle · one word, two constructsparadigm3 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, three constructsdecay4 fields · 5 citationsjingle · one word, four constructs

References

  1. Young, T. (1804). The Bakerian Lecture: Experiments and calculations relative to physical optics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 94, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstl.1804.0001
  2. Underwood, B. J. (1957). Interference and forgetting. Psychological Review, 64(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0044616
  3. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(6), 643–662. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054651
  4. Andrews, J. G., Baccelli, F., & Ganti, R. K. (2011). A tractable approach to coverage and rate in cellular networks. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 59(11), 3122–3134. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2011.100411.100541
  5. Perlman, H. S. (1982). Interference with contract and other economic expectancies: A clash of tort and contract doctrine. University of Chicago Law Review, 49(1), 61–129. https://doi.org/10.2307/1599438

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct