Construct · 3 fields · 4 citations

Where does paradigm collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, three constructs Nearest construct by meaningrevolutioncompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to paradigm is revolution.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

Kuhn adapted the grammar termparadigm3 CONSTRUCTSGrammatical paradigmDIONYSIUS THRAX · FORMSKuhnian paradigmKUHN · NORMAL SCIENCEProgramming paradigmFLOYD · PROGRAMMING STYLE

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Linguistics and grammar

A word's set of inflected forms

In grammar the paradigm is the complete set of inflected forms that a single word takes, such as the case forms of a Latin noun or the tenses of a verb. This is the oldest meaning of the word, rooted in the ancient grammatical tradition of Dionysius Thrax (Technē grammatikē, ca. 100 BCE), and it is treated in modern morphology by Matthews (1991), where a paradigm is the organised table of a word's variant shapes. The referent here is a fixed pattern of word forms in a language, not a scientist's worldview, a laboratory task, or a style of writing computer code.[1][2]

Unit
One inflectional pattern: the full set of case, number, tense, or person forms of a word
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Laid out as declension or conjugation tables and compared across word classes and languages

Philosophy of science

A shared framework of normal science

In the philosophy of science a paradigm is the shared framework that guides a research community during periods of normal science: the accepted exemplars, methods, and assumptions that define legitimate problems and their solutions. Kuhn set out this meaning in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962), where science advances through long normal periods punctuated by revolutions that replace one paradigm with another. Kuhn drew the word from grammar, where a paradigm is a model to be imitated, but his referent is a whole discipline's worldview, not a table of word forms, a laboratory task, or a programming style.[3]

Unit
One disciplinary framework: the shared exemplars, methods, and assumptions of a research community
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Identified by historians through a field's shared textbooks, exemplar problems, and accepted methods

Computer science

A style or model of programming

In computer science a paradigm is a general style or model of computation, such as procedural, functional, object-oriented, or logic programming. Floyd named this meaning in his Turing Award lecture, published in 1979 as The paradigms of programming, arguing that mastering several such styles makes a better programmer and that languages should support them. The referent is a way of organising computation and code, not a word's inflected forms, a scientist's worldview, or a fixed laboratory task.[4]

Unit
One model of computation: a general style such as procedural, functional, or logic programming
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Described by the language features and problem-solving structures a style provides

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how paradigm sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

model3 fields · 3 citationsjingle · one word, three constructsinterference4 fields · 5 citationsjingle · one word, four unrelated constructscode3 fields · 6 citationsjingle · one word, three constructs

References

  1. Davidson, T. (Trans.). (1874). The grammar of Dionysios Thrax. Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 8. (Original work published ca. 100 BCE)
  2. Matthews, P. H. (1991). Morphology (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  3. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
  4. Floyd, R. W. (1979). The paradigms of programming. Communications of the ACM, 22(8), 455–460. https://doi.org/10.1145/359138.359140

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct