Construct · 3 fields · 3 citations

Where does coverage collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, three constructs Nearest construct by meaningconfidencecompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to coverage is confidence.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

coverage3 CONSTRUCTSCoverage probabilityNEYMAN · CI COVERAGEInsurance coverageSMITH · POLICY COVERAGESequencing coverageLANDER-WATERMAN · DEPTH

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Statistics

Long-run probability an interval contains the true parameter

In frequentist statistics, coverage is the long-run proportion of interval estimates that contain the true value of the parameter being estimated: an interval procedure with 95 percent coverage produces intervals that trap the true value in 95 of every 100 repeated samples. Neyman's 1937 Outline of a Theory of Statistical Estimation Based on the Classical Theory of Probability introduced the confidence interval and defined its confidence coefficient as exactly this probability of enclosing the true value. Here coverage is a probability attached to a procedure across hypothetical repetitions, not the money a policy will pay out or the number of times a genome base is read.[1]

Unit
A probability, the fraction of repeated intervals that contain the true parameter value
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Derived analytically as the interval procedure's confidence coefficient, or estimated by repeated-sampling simulation

Insurance economics

Scope of losses an indemnity policy will pay

In insurance, coverage is the scope of losses that an indemnity policy will pay for: it is fixed by the perils named, the limits, the deductible, and the exclusions written into the contract, and it determines how much of a realised loss the insurer reimburses. Vernon Smith's 1968 Optimal Insurance Coverage analysed how much coverage a risk-averse buyer should rationally purchase given its price, treating the amount of loss indemnified as the choice variable; the underlying industry and legal meaning of the term is much older than this economic treatment. Here coverage is the reach of a contractual promise to pay, not a repeated-sampling probability or a count of sequencing reads.[2]

Unit
The set of losses a policy reimburses, bounded by limits, deductibles, and exclusions
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Read from the policy contract and priced actuarially by the expected indemnified loss

Genomics

Average number of reads spanning each base (read depth)

In genome sequencing, coverage (also called read depth) is the average number of times each base in a target is independently read: sequencing to 30x coverage means each position is spanned by about 30 reads on average, which raises confidence that true bases are told apart from errors. Lander and Waterman's 1988 Genomic mapping by fingerprinting random clones: A mathematical analysis gave the mathematical model relating the number of random fragments, their length, and the expected coverage and gaps of an assembled genome. Here coverage is a physical redundancy of observation over a sequence, not a probability that an interval brackets a parameter or the losses a policy will indemnify.[3]

Unit
A dimensionless multiple (e.g. 30x), the mean number of reads spanning each base
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Computed as total sequenced bases divided by genome length, or per base from aligned reads

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how coverage sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

interval4 fields · 5 citationsjingle · one word, four constructsindemnity2 fields · 2 citationsjingle · one word, two constructsrisk6 fields · 13 citationsjingle · one name, six constructs

References

  1. Neyman, J. (1937). Outline of a theory of statistical estimation based on the classical theory of probability. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, 236(767), 333–380. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1937.0005
  2. Smith, V. L. (1968). Optimal insurance coverage. Journal of Political Economy, 76(1), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.1086/259382
  3. Lander, E. S., & Waterman, M. S. (1988). Genomic mapping by fingerprinting random clones: A mathematical analysis. Genomics, 2(3), 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0888-7543(88)90007-9

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct