Construct · 3 fields · 6 citations

Where does depth collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, three constructs Nearest construct by meaningcuecompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to depth is cue.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

depth3 CONSTRUCTSDepth perceptionWHEATSTONE · BINOCULAR 3DOptical depthSCHUSTER · OPTICAL DEPTHData depthTUKEY · DATA CENTRALITY

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Perceptual psychology

Recovery of 3D distance from vision

Depth perception is the recovery of three-dimensional distance and layout from the flat images formed on the two eyes. Wheatstone's 1838 Contributions to the physiology of vision showed with his stereoscope that the small differences between the left-eye and right-eye views are themselves a cue the visual system uses to reconstruct solid form, and Julesz's 1960 Binocular depth perception of computer-generated patterns demonstrated with random-dot patterns that this reconstruction works from those differences alone, with no shape visible in either image on its own. The referent here is a perceptual achievement of a viewer, the felt distance of things in a scene, and it is not the opacity of a medium along a line of sight or a point's centrality within a cloud of data.[1][2]

Unit
One viewer's perceived distance or three-dimensional layout of a scene
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Assessed by stereoacuity thresholds and depth-judgment tasks that vary binocular and monocular cues

Astrophysics and optics

Attenuation of light along a sightline

Optical depth is a dimensionless measure of how strongly a medium attenuates radiation passing along a line of sight, set by the amount of absorbing and scattering material in the path. Schuster's 1905 Radiation through a foggy atmosphere introduced this bookkeeping of absorption and scattering through a layered atmosphere, and Chandrasekhar's 1950 Radiative transfer made it the standard variable of the field, with the transmitted intensity falling by a factor of e over one unit of optical depth. The referent is a property of the medium and the path, counted in units of attenuation, and it has nothing to do with a viewer's perceived distance or with a data point's standing in a distribution.[3][4]

Unit
A dimensionless attenuation along one line of sight, in e-foldings of intensity
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Computed as the path integral of the extinction coefficient, or inferred from the observed dimming of a background source

Statistics

How central a point is in a distribution

Data depth is a measure of how central, or how far from the outer edge, a point lies within a distribution or a batch of observations, giving a way to order multivariate data from the middle outward. Tukey proposed the idea in his 1975 address Mathematics and the picturing of data, where the deepest point serves as a multivariate median, and Liu's 1990 On a notion of data depth based on random simplices gave it a precise probabilistic definition and studied its properties. The referent is a number assigned to a point relative to a data set, largest at the center and small at the fringe, and it is unrelated to the perceived distance of objects to a viewer or to the attenuation of light through a medium.[5][6]

Unit
A depth value assigned to one point relative to a data set, largest at the center
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Computed by a depth function such as simplicial or halfspace depth over the sample

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how depth sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

parallax3 fields · 5 citationsjingle · one word, three constructsopacity5 fields · 8 citationsjingle · one word, five constructscentrality4 fields · 7 citationsjingle · one word, four constructs

References

  1. Wheatstone, C. (1838). Contributions to the physiology of vision. Part the first. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 128, 371–394. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstl.1838.0019
  2. Julesz, B. (1960). Binocular depth perception of computer-generated patterns. Bell System Technical Journal, 39(5), 1125–1162. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1960.tb03954.x
  3. Schuster, A. (1905). Radiation through a foggy atmosphere. The Astrophysical Journal, 21, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1086/141186
  4. Chandrasekhar, S. (1950). Radiative transfer. Oxford University Press.
  5. Tukey, J. W. (1975). Mathematics and the picturing of data. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians (Vol. 2, pp. 523–531). Canadian Mathematical Congress.
  6. Liu, R. Y. (1990). On a notion of data depth based on random simplices. The Annals of Statistics, 18(1), 405–414. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176347507

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct