Construct · 4 fields · 5 citations
One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.
● jingle · one word, four constructs Nearest construct by meaningaffectcompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to intensity is affect.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
In physics, intensity is the power a wave or field delivers per unit area, so a brighter light, a louder sound, or a stronger beam all carry more energy across a surface each second. Bouguer's 1729 Essai d'optique sur la gradation de la lumière founded the quantitative measurement of light's intensity and the law by which light fades through an absorbing medium, and later work carried the same power-per-area quantity over to sound and other waves. Here the referent is a measurable flux of physical energy, given in watts per square metre, and not the degree of a felt emotion, the rate of scattered events, or a philosopher's degree of a quality.[1]
In philosophy, an intensive magnitude is a quantity that has a degree rather than parts you can add up, such as warmth, brightness, or pressure, which can be more or less intense without being built from countable units. Kant's 1781 Kritik der reinen Vernunft, in the section called the Anticipations of Perception, defined intensive magnitude as what is grasped only as a degree, set it against extensive magnitude that is built from parts, and drew on an older scholastic debate about the intension and remission of qualities. The referent is a philosophical property of how much of a quality is present, argued in metaphysics, and not a physical energy flux, a statistical rate, or a personality trait.[2]
In statistics, the intensity of a point process is the rate at which events occur, the expected number of points per unit of time or space that governs models of random arrivals. Poisson's 1837 Recherches sur la probabilité des jugements en matière criminelle et en matière civile introduced the distribution of rare events whose rate parameter this intensity is, and Cox's 1955 Some Statistical Methods Connected with Series of Events set out the intensity function for series of events whose rate may change over time. The referent is a rate parameter in a probability model, estimated from counts of events, and it shares only the word with a wave's energy flux, a degree of a quality, or the strength of a person's emotions.[3][4]
In psychology, affect intensity is a stable individual difference in how strongly a person typically experiences emotions, whether positive or negative, apart from which emotion it happens to be. Larsen and Diener's 1987 Affect intensity as an individual difference characteristic defined and reviewed the trait and tied it to a self-report scale, the Affect Intensity Measure, on which some people report reliably stronger emotional reactions than others. The referent is a measured characteristic of a person's emotional life, and not the physical power of a wave, the rate of random events, or a philosophical degree of a quality.[5]
Next
See how intensity sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct