Construct · 4 fields · 6 citations

Where does target collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, four constructs Nearest construct by meaningtargetingcompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to target is targeting.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

target4 CONSTRUCTSDrug targetEHRLICH · BINDING SITEPolicy targetTINBERGEN · POLICY GOALTarget marketSMITH · CHOSEN SEGMENTTarget stimulusMEYER · PROBE STIMULUS

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Pharmacology

A molecular binding site a drug acts on

In pharmacology a target is the specific molecule, such as a receptor, an enzyme, or a stretch of nucleic acid, that a drug binds to produce its effect. Paul Ehrlich's 1913 Address in Pathology, on Chemiotherapy set out the principle that a therapeutic agent should strike the parasite or diseased cell while sparing the host, an idea he framed as learning to aim a chemical substance at a chosen chemical receptor. Hopkins and Groom's 2002 The druggable genome later recast the idea as the set of human proteins whose binding sites can be engaged by drug-like molecules. The referent is a physical binding site in a cell or organism, not a numeric goal for economic policy, a chosen group of customers, or a probe word shown in a memory experiment.[1][2]

Unit
One molecular binding site engaged by a drug, such as a receptor, an enzyme, or a nucleic acid
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Assessed by binding assays, affinity constants, and dose-response measures of the drug's effect at the site

Economics

A desired value a policy aims to hit

In economic policy a target is a quantity, such as an inflation rate or an employment level, that the authorities commit to bring to a chosen value. Jan Tinbergen's 1952 On the Theory of Economic Policy introduced the distinction between targets, the goals of policy, and instruments, the tools used to reach them, and argued that a government needs at least as many instruments as it has targets. Bernanke and Mishkin's 1997 Inflation Targeting: A New Framework for Monetary Policy? applied the idea to central banking, where a stated inflation number becomes the announced target. The referent is a desired value of an economic variable, not a molecule a drug binds, a group of customers a firm selects, or a stimulus shown in a laboratory.[3][4]

Unit
One economic variable set to a desired value, for example a 2 percent inflation rate
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Tracked by the gap between the realised outcome and the announced value over a policy horizon

Marketing

A market segment a firm chooses to serve

In marketing a target is the group of buyers a firm selects to serve, drawn from the wider market and matched to a tailored offer. Wendell Smith's 1956 Product Differentiation and Market Segmentation as Alternative Marketing Strategies introduced market segmentation, the dividing of a varied market into groups with distinct wants, which set up the later step of choosing which group to aim at, the target market. The referent is a selected set of customers defined by shared characteristics, not a binding site in a cell, a desired value for a policy variable, or a word presented to a subject.[5]

Unit
One selected customer group defined by shared traits or needs
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Delimited by segmentation variables such as demographics, behaviour, or needs, and sized by its share and value

Cognitive psychology

The stimulus a subject responds to after a prime

In cognitive psychology a target is the stimulus a participant must respond to, often a word or a picture, presented after an earlier prime. Meyer and Schvaneveldt's 1971 Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words showed that people judge a target word faster when it follows a related word, establishing the prime-target pairing at the centre of semantic priming research. The referent is a probe item shown in an experiment and timed by the response it draws, not a molecule a drug binds, a goal for an economy, or a group of customers a firm selects.[6]

Unit
One probe item, a word, a picture, or another stimulus, shown for a timed response
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Indexed by reaction time and accuracy of the response to the target, compared across prime conditions

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how target sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

segmentation5 fields · 5 citationsjingle · one word, five constructspriming4 fields · 5 citationsjingle · one word, four constructsagonist1 fields · 3 citationsanchor · a standalone construct

References

  1. Ehrlich, P. (1913). Address in pathology, on chemiotherapy: Delivered before the Seventeenth International Congress of Medicine. British Medical Journal, 2(2746), 353–359. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.2746.353
  2. Hopkins, A. L., & Groom, C. R. (2002). The druggable genome. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 1(9), 727–730. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd892
  3. Tinbergen, J. (1952). On the theory of economic policy. North-Holland.
  4. Bernanke, B. S., & Mishkin, F. S. (1997). Inflation targeting: A new framework for monetary policy? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(2), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.11.2.97
  5. Smith, W. R. (1956). Product differentiation and market segmentation as alternative marketing strategies. Journal of Marketing, 21(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224295602100102
  6. Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90(2), 227–234. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031564

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct