Construct · 4 fields · 4 citations
One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.
● jingle · one word, four constructs Nearest construct by meaningpuritycompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to substance is purity.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
A form of matter that has a definite, constant composition and a characteristic set of properties, such as a single pure element or a single pure compound, as distinct from a mixture of two or more of these. The IUPAC Compendium of Chemical Terminology (the Gold Book) fixes this usage, treating a chemical substance as matter of a fixed makeup that cannot be separated into components by physical means. The referent here is a material sample defined by what it is made of and how it behaves, identified in a laboratory, and it has nothing to do with what a philosopher says underlies a thing's properties, what a statute lists as a regulated drug, or what a linguist calls the raw material of a language.[1]
The basic kind of thing that exists in its own right and underlies or carries properties, rather than existing only as a property of something else: a horse or a person is a substance, while its color or its height is not. The category runs from Aristotle's ousia, through Descartes and Spinoza, to modern treatments such as Lowe's 2006 The Four-Category Ontology, which defends substances as independent particulars that bear attributes. The referent is an ontological category, a role a thing plays in a theory of what there is, and it is not a laboratory sample of matter, a drug named in a statute, or the raw material a linguist opposes to form.[2]
A drug or chemical whose manufacture, possession, distribution, and use are restricted by statute because of its potential for abuse and its accepted medical use. In the United States the Controlled Substances Act of 1970 sorts such substances into five schedules, from those banned outright to those available by prescription, and comparable regimes exist under the United Nations drug conventions. The referent is a legal classification attached to a compound by legislation and regulation, and whether a compound counts turns on the law, not on chemistry alone: it is a different construct from matter of fixed composition, from the metaphysician's bearer of properties, or from a linguist's raw material.[3]
The unformed raw material of a language, the continuous stuff of sound or of meaning, on which the abstract system of form imposes its distinctions. In Hjelmslev's 1961 Prolegomena to a Theory of Language every plane of a language, expression and content alike, has a substance and a form, and it is the form that structures the otherwise shapeless substance into a system. The referent is a theoretical layer in a model of language, the material that form organizes, and it is unrelated to a pure chemical sample, to the metaphysician's independent bearer, or to a drug named in a statute.[4]
Next
See how substance sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct