Construct · 4 fields · 4 citations

Where does substance collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, four constructs Nearest construct by meaningpuritycompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to substance is purity.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

substance4 CONSTRUCTSChemical substanceIUPAC · PURE SUBSTANCESubstance (ousia)LOWE · INDEPENDENT BEARERControlled substanceCSA 1970 · SCHEDULED DRUGSubstance (form)HJELMSLEV · RAW MATERIAL

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Chemistry

a form of matter with a definite, constant composition and characteristic properties, such as a pure element or compound.

A form of matter that has a definite, constant composition and a characteristic set of properties, such as a single pure element or a single pure compound, as distinct from a mixture of two or more of these. The IUPAC Compendium of Chemical Terminology (the Gold Book) fixes this usage, treating a chemical substance as matter of a fixed makeup that cannot be separated into components by physical means. The referent here is a material sample defined by what it is made of and how it behaves, identified in a laboratory, and it has nothing to do with what a philosopher says underlies a thing's properties, what a statute lists as a regulated drug, or what a linguist calls the raw material of a language.[1]

Unit
One pure element or compound of constant composition
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Identified by constant melting and boiling points, density, and spectra, and shown to be inseparable by physical means

Philosophy and metaphysics

the basic kind of thing that exists in its own right and bears properties, rather than being a property.

The basic kind of thing that exists in its own right and underlies or carries properties, rather than existing only as a property of something else: a horse or a person is a substance, while its color or its height is not. The category runs from Aristotle's ousia, through Descartes and Spinoza, to modern treatments such as Lowe's 2006 The Four-Category Ontology, which defends substances as independent particulars that bear attributes. The referent is an ontological category, a role a thing plays in a theory of what there is, and it is not a laboratory sample of matter, a drug named in a statute, or the raw material a linguist opposes to form.[2]

Unit
One independent particular that bears properties
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Argued for by its role in ontology: what can exist on its own and support properties, versus what depends on a bearer

Law

a drug or chemical whose manufacture, possession, distribution and use are restricted by statute for its abuse potential.

A drug or chemical whose manufacture, possession, distribution, and use are restricted by statute because of its potential for abuse and its accepted medical use. In the United States the Controlled Substances Act of 1970 sorts such substances into five schedules, from those banned outright to those available by prescription, and comparable regimes exist under the United Nations drug conventions. The referent is a legal classification attached to a compound by legislation and regulation, and whether a compound counts turns on the law, not on chemistry alone: it is a different construct from matter of fixed composition, from the metaphysician's bearer of properties, or from a linguist's raw material.[3]

Unit
One drug or chemical placed on a legal schedule
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Determined by statutory schedules and regulatory listing, based on abuse potential and accepted medical use

Linguistics and semiotics

the unformed raw material of a language, sound or meaning, which the system of form structures into distinctions.

The unformed raw material of a language, the continuous stuff of sound or of meaning, on which the abstract system of form imposes its distinctions. In Hjelmslev's 1961 Prolegomena to a Theory of Language every plane of a language, expression and content alike, has a substance and a form, and it is the form that structures the otherwise shapeless substance into a system. The referent is a theoretical layer in a model of language, the material that form organizes, and it is unrelated to a pure chemical sample, to the metaphysician's independent bearer, or to a drug named in a statute.[4]

Unit
One plane's raw material, of expression or of content
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Distinguished from form in analysis by isolating the material continuum that the linguistic system carves up

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how substance sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

compound3 fields · 3 citationsjingle · one word, three constructsessence2 fields · 2 citationsjingle · one word, two constructsconcentration4 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, four constructs

References

  1. International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry. (2019). The IUPAC compendium of chemical terminology (the Gold Book) (V. Gold, Ed.). IUPAC. https://doi.org/10.1351/goldbook
  2. Lowe, E. J. (2006). The four-category ontology: A metaphysical foundation for natural science. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199254397.001.0001
  3. Controlled Substances Act, Pub. L. No. 91-513, 84 Stat. 1236, 21 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (1970).
  4. Hjelmslev, L. (1961). Prolegomena to a theory of language (F. J. Whitfield, Trans.). University of Wisconsin Press. (Original work published 1943)

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct