Construct · 3 fields · 5 citations

Where does element collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, three constructs Nearest construct by meaningcompoundcompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to element is compound.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

element3 CONSTRUCTSChemical elementIUPAC · ONE ATOMSet memberHALMOS · MEMBERElement of a claimRESTATEMENT · MUST PROVE

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Chemistry

a substance whose atoms all share the same number of protons, fixing its place on the periodic table.

A substance made of atoms that all share the same number of protons, the property that fixes its place on the periodic table. In the IUPAC Compendium of Chemical Terminology an element is defined by atomic number: hydrogen is every atom with one proton, oxygen every atom with eight, whatever the isotope. The referent is a kind of matter in the physical world, and membership is settled by counting protons, not by choice or argument. Scerri's history of the periodic table shows the ordering is a discovered regularity, not a convention: the elements fall into place by proton number whether or not anyone tabulates them. This meaning shares only the word with the others; a proton count says nothing about a set, a legal claim, or the four classical roots.[1][2]

Unit
A kind of matter fixed by proton number
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Atomic number, read from the count of protons in the nucleus

Mathematics

A member of a set

An object that belongs to a set, related to it by the membership relation written with the symbol for is an element of. In Halmos's Naive Set Theory everything hinges on this single primitive: to say x is an element of A is to say x is one of the things A collects, and a set is determined entirely by which objects are its elements. The referent is abstract and the relation is stipulated, not measured: an object is an element of a set because the set was defined to include it, and the same object can be an element of one set and not another. Unlike a chemical element, nothing about the object itself makes it an element; only its relation to a chosen collection does.[3]

Unit
An object standing in the membership relation to a set
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Whether the membership relation holds between an object and a set, by the set's definition

Law

one of the components a party must prove for a cause of action or crime to be made out.

One of the components a party must prove for a cause of action or a crime to be made out, each of which has to be established or the claim fails. The Restatement (Second) of Torts sets the elements of negligence at section 281: a duty owed, a breach of that duty, a causal link, and resulting harm. Keeton and colleagues treat these as separate requirements carried by the plaintiff's burden of proof, so that missing any one defeats the whole. The referent is a requirement inside a legal test, and what makes something an element is doctrine plus the burden of proof, not a proton count and not a chosen set. The meanings touch only at the idea of a necessary part; the parts here are things a court must find, not objects or atoms.[4][5]

Unit
A component of a legal test that must be proven
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Whether each required component is established to the applicable standard of proof

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how element sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

base3 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, three constructscausation6 fields · 15 citationsjingle · one name, six constructsrepresentation7 fields · 9 citationsjingle · one name, six constructs

References

  1. International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry. (2019). Compendium of chemical terminology (the "Gold Book") (2nd ed., online version). IUPAC.
  2. Scerri, E. R. (2007). The periodic table: Its story and its significance. Oxford University Press.
  3. Halmos, P. R. (1960). Naive set theory. Van Nostrand.
  4. American Law Institute. (1965). Restatement (second) of torts § 281. American Law Institute.
  5. Keeton, W. P., Dobbs, D. B., Keeton, R. E., & Owen, D. G. (1984). Prosser and Keeton on the law of torts (5th ed.). West Publishing. ISBN 9780314748805

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct