Construct · 3 fields · 3 citations

Where does argument collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, three constructs Nearest construct by meaningparametercompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to argument is parameter.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

argument3 CONSTRUCTSLogicCOPI · SUPPORTComplex numberNEEDHAM · ANGLEPredicate argumentCARNIE · PARTICIPANT

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Logic and philosophy

a set of statements, one of which, the conclusion, is claimed to follow from the others, the premises.

In logic an argument is a set of statements, one of which, the conclusion, is claimed to follow from the others, the premises. Copi, Cohen, and Rodych open Introduction to Logic with exactly this: an argument is not a quarrel but a structured offering of reasons, and the questions asked of it are whether it is valid, whether the premises are true, and so whether it is sound. The referent is a piece of reasoning set out in language, and the unit is the premise-and-conclusion pair. What makes this meaning distinct is that an argument here is judged by whether the conclusion is supported, a property no angle, input, or grammatical participant can have.[1]

Unit
A set of premises offered for a conclusion
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Identified by locating the conclusion and the premises offered to support it, then testing for validity and soundness

Mathematics

The angle of a complex number

In mathematics the argument of a complex number is its angle: for a number written in polar form, the argument is the angle its vector makes with the positive real axis, so that a number is fixed by a modulus and an argument together. Needham sets this out geometrically in Visual Complex Analysis, where arg(z) is the phase and multiplication is rotation. The word carries a second, older mathematical use as well, in which the argument of a function is simply its input. The referent is a number's position on the plane, and the unit is an angle in radians. This meaning shares nothing with the logical one but the spelling: there is no conclusion and nothing to be valid, only a direction.[2]

Unit
The phase angle of a complex number, in radians
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Read off as arg(z), the angle a complex number's vector makes with the positive real axis

Linguistics

A participant a predicate requires

In linguistics an argument is a participant that a predicate requires in order to be complete: the verb give, for instance, calls for a giver, a thing given, and a recipient, and each of those is one of its arguments. Carnie describes this in Syntax: A Generative Introduction through argument structure and theta roles, the analysis descending from Tesniere's notion of valency, the number of arguments a predicate can take. The referent is a slot in a predicate's frame and the phrase that fills it, and the unit is one such participant. It differs from the logical meaning in that nothing here is offered in support of anything: an argument is demanded by a word's meaning, not marshalled toward a conclusion.[3]

Unit
A participant required by a predicate
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Diagnosed by which phrases a predicate obligatorily requires, as against optional adjuncts, and by theta-role assignment

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how argument sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

reasoning6 fields · 17 citationsjingle · one name, six constructsfunction5 fields · 6 citationsjingle · one word, five constructsinference3 fields · 5 citationsjingle · one word, three constructs

References

  1. Copi, I. M., Cohen, C., & Rodych, V. (2018). Introduction to logic (15th ed.). Routledge.
  2. Needham, T. (1997). Visual complex analysis. Clarendon Press.
  3. Carnie, A. (2013). Syntax: A generative introduction (3rd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct