Construct · 4 fields · 7 citations

Where does frequency collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, four constructs Nearest construct by meaningperiodcompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to frequency is period.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

frequency4 CONSTRUCTSCycles per secondFRENCH · CYCLES/SECCount of a valueYULE · COUNT OF A VALUELong-run frequencyVON MISES · LONG-RUNWord frequencyZIPF · WORD IN CORPUS

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Physics

Cycles per unit time

How many times a periodic phenomenon repeats in a unit of time, measured in hertz, where one hertz is one cycle per second. In the physics of waves and oscillation, set out in texts such as French's Vibrations and Waves and fixed by the SI definition of the hertz, frequency is the reciprocal of the period: a wave that completes a cycle every half second has a frequency of two hertz. The referent is a physical oscillation, a swinging pendulum, a vibrating string, an electromagnetic wave, and the quantity is a rate, cycles divided by time. This is not a tally of anything discrete; it is how fast a continuous repetition turns over, and it carries a unit of inverse seconds that the other meanings do not.[1][2]

Unit
Hertz (cycles per second)
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Counting cycles of an oscillation over a timed interval, or reading the period and inverting it

Descriptive statistics

Count of a value's occurrences

How many times a particular value or category shows up in a set of observations. In descriptive statistics, laid out in texts such as Yule and Kendall's An Introduction to the Theory of Statistics, the frequency of a value is its raw count, and arranging every value with its count gives a frequency distribution, the table or histogram that summarises the data. The referent is a data set, and the quantity is a whole number of occurrences, not a rate over time. A relative frequency divides that count by the total, giving a proportion between zero and one. Here frequency has no unit of time and no oscillation; it is simply a tally of how common a value is.[3]

Unit
A count of occurrences (dimensionless)
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Tallying how often each value appears in a sample, then tabulating the counts as a distribution

Probability theory

probability defined as the limit a relative frequency approaches as a trial is repeated without end.

Probability defined as the limit a relative frequency approaches as a trial is repeated without end. In the frequentist interpretation, argued by Venn's The Logic of Chance and formalised by von Mises's Probability, Statistics and Truth, the probability of an event is not a degree of belief but the value its relative frequency settles toward in an unending sequence of like trials, what von Mises called a collective. The referent is a hypothetical endless run of experiments, and the quantity is a limiting proportion. This borrows the idea of counting but turns it into a theory of what probability is: the count of an outcome divided by the number of trials, taken to the limit, rather than a tally of a finite sample.[4][5]

Unit
A limiting proportion between 0 and 1
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Estimated by the relative frequency of an outcome across a long series of repeated trials

Corpus linguistics

How often a word occurs in text

How many times a word form appears in a body of text, and how that count behaves across the whole vocabulary. In corpus linguistics, word frequency is the count of a token in a corpus, and Zipf's Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort observed that a word's frequency is roughly inversely proportional to its rank, so a handful of words are very common and a long tail are rare, a regularity reviewed by Piantadosi. The referent is a corpus of language, and the quantity is a count of occurrences, often reported per million words so corpora of different sizes can be compared. It shares the plain counting of descriptive statistics, but its object is words in text, and its signature is the skewed rank-frequency curve rather than any single number.[6][7]

Unit
Occurrences (often per million words)
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Counting token occurrences in a corpus, often normalised per million words and ranked

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how frequency sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

resonance6 fields · 13 citationsjingle · one name, six constructsprior3 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, three constructssalience4 fields · 7 citationsjingle · one word, four constructs

References

  1. French, A. P. (1971). Vibrations and waves. W. W. Norton. ISBN 9780393099249
  2. Bureau International des Poids et Mesures. (2019). The international system of units (SI) (9th ed.). BIPM.
  3. Yule, G. U., & Kendall, M. G. (1950). An introduction to the theory of statistics (14th ed.). Charles Griffin.
  4. Venn, J. (1888). The logic of chance (3rd ed.). Macmillan.
  5. von Mises, R. (1957). Probability, statistics and truth (2nd rev. English ed.). Macmillan. (Original work published 1928)
  6. Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Addison-Wesley.
  7. Piantadosi, S. T. (2014). Zipf's word frequency law in natural language: A critical review and future directions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(5), 1112–1130. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0585-6

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct