Construct · 6 fields · 13 citations
One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.
● jingle · one name, six constructs Nearest construct by meaningresource mobilizationcompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to resonance is resource mobilization.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
The large response of an oscillating system when it is driven at a frequency close to its own natural frequency, so that each push arrives in step with the motion and the amplitude builds until damping balances the drive. French's textbook treatment gives the response curve, its peak at the natural frequency and its width set by the damping. The standard classroom example is wrong: Billah and Scanlan showed in 1991 that the Tacoma Narrows bridge of 1940 was destroyed by aeroelastic flutter, a self-excited instability, not by wind gusts matching a natural frequency, and that the textbooks had repeated the error for fifty years. Resonance here is a relation between a driving frequency and a system's own, and it has a number.[1][2]
The absorption and re-emission of radio-frequency energy by atomic nuclei in a magnetic field, at a frequency set by the field strength, and the imaging built on it. The physics is the resonance of the previous spoke applied to precessing nuclei. Lauterbur showed in 1973 that a gradient in the field makes the resonant frequency depend on position, so that the signal can be turned into an image; Mansfield and Grannell published the same idea the same year in terms of diffraction. Clinical practice dropped the word nuclear and kept resonance. A radiologist reading an MRI is using the physics meaning exactly, and none of the social meanings at all.[3][4]
The top of Keller's customer-based brand equity pyramid: the state in which customers feel in sync with the brand, expressed as loyalty, attachment, a sense of community with other users, and active engagement beyond purchase. Keller fixed the model in a 2001 Marketing Science Institute report that builds from salience through performance, imagery, judgements and feelings to resonance, and his 2003 synthesis placed it inside a multidimensional account of brand knowledge. Resonance here is a property of a customer's relationship with a brand, achieved at the end of a sequence, and the measure is what the customer does and says. No frequency is involved, and the word means intensity and fit.[5][6]
The degree to which a movement's interpretive frame strikes a chord with the people it hopes to mobilise, so that they take it up. Snow, Rochford, Worden and Benford introduced frame alignment in 1986, and Snow and Benford named resonance in 1988 as the variable that decides which frames mobilise: a frame that is empirically credible, fits the audience's experience and matches their cultural narratives resonates, and one that does not fails whatever its logic. Benford and Snow's 2000 review sorted the conditions into credibility (consistency, empirical fit, credible articulators) and salience, centrality, experiential commensurability, narrative fidelity. Resonance here is a fit between a message and a culture, judged by whether people act on it.[7][8][9]
A mode of relating to the world in which something touches us, we respond, both sides are changed, and the outcome cannot be forced. Rosa fixed the concept in 2016, in English in 2019, as the answer to alienation: a life is good not when it has more of the world within reach but when it stands in resonant relations along horizontal axes to other people, diagonal axes to things and work, and vertical axes to nature, art, history and religion. The four marks are being affected, responding with self-efficacy, being transformed, and the unavailability of the result to control. Susen's 2020 review took the theory's measure and pressed on whether a relation nobody can command can ground a critique of society. Resonance here is normative (a criterion for a good life) and is defined by its opposite.[10][11]
The description of a molecule's electronic structure as a combination of two or more valence-bond structures, none of which is the molecule on its own, with the actual state lower in energy than any of them. Pauling fixed the idea in 1931 and gave it the field's textbook in 1939: benzene is not alternating between two Kekulé structures but is a single hybrid of them, and the extra stability is the resonance energy. The name came from Heisenberg's quantum-mechanical treatment of exchange, which had borrowed it from coupled oscillators, and Pauling insisted that nothing oscillates: the structures are a bookkeeping device and the resonance is between drawings. This is the one meaning on the page in which resonance is explicitly not a motion.[12][13]
Next
See how resonance sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct