Construct · 4 fields · 5 citations
One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.
● jingle · one word, four constructs Nearest construct by meaningtraitcompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to stability is trait.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
In dynamical systems and control theory, stability is a property of an equilibrium: whether a system that starts near a resting state, or is nudged away from it, stays near that state or returns to it over time. Aleksandr Lyapunov set out the modern account in his 1892 dissertation The General Problem of the Stability of Motion, giving conditions under which small perturbations stay small (Lyapunov stability) or decay to zero (asymptotic stability) without solving the equations of motion. The referent is a trajectory of a mathematical system, the unit is distance from the equilibrium, and stability is proved, not rated. This is the meaning that lends its picture, return to equilibrium after a perturbation, to every other field on this page.[1]
In personality psychology, emotional stability is a broad trait describing how calm, even-tempered, and untroubled a person tends to be, the low end of the neuroticism factor in the Big Five. John and Srivastava, in their 1999 chapter The Big Five Trait Taxonomy, place it among the five dimensions recovered again and again from the words people use to describe one another, opposite a pole marked by anxiety, moodiness, and vulnerability to stress. The referent is a person, the unit is a standing on a self-report or observer scale, and the trait is estimated from questionnaire items, never proved. It shares only the word with the control-theory meaning: an emotionally stable person is not a system returning to an equilibrium.[2]
In ecology, stability describes an ecosystem's tendency to persist through disturbance: to resist change in its species and functions (resistance) and to return toward its former state after a shock (resilience). Robert May's 1973 book Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems showed, against the earlier intuition, that adding species and connections could make model communities less stable, opening the diversity-stability debate that field experiments such as Tilman, Wedin, and Knops (1996) later tested in grasslands. The referent is a community of interacting populations, the unit is variation in abundance or composition over time, and stability is observed or modelled, not proved. The word covers several distinct properties here, which is why ecologists name the one they mean.[3][4]
In economics and central banking, financial stability names a state in which the financial system, its banks, markets, and payment infrastructure, absorbs shocks and keeps performing its functions without the disruption of a crisis; price stability, its narrower cousin, names an economy free of excessive inflation. Garry Schinasi, in the 2004 IMF working paper Defining Financial Stability, treats it not as a single point but as a range within which the system can allocate resources and manage risk well enough to withstand disturbance. The referent is an economy or financial system, the unit is the absence of excessive volatility or systemic disruption, and stability is judged against indicators, not proved. A stable economy and a stable equilibrium point share a word and little else.[5]
Next
See how stability sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct