Construct · 3 fields · 3 citations
One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.
● jingle · one word, three constructs Nearest construct by meaningSharpe ratiocompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to return is Sharpe ratio.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
The gain or loss an investment produces over a period, expressed as a rate relative to the amount put in: a total return folds together price change and any income such as dividends, and a return is judged against the risk taken to earn it. Sharpe's 1966 Mutual Fund Performance introduced the reward-to-variability ratio, now the Sharpe ratio, which divides a portfolio's excess return by its volatility and sets out the risk-return tradeoff. The referent is a rate earned on capital over time, not the extra output from adding an input, not the cumulative reward an agent collects, and not a value a function hands back to its caller.[1]
In production theory, the returns describe how output changes as inputs are increased: under the law of diminishing marginal returns, once a point is passed each extra unit of a single input adds less output than the unit before it, while returns to scale describe what happens to output when every input is scaled up together. Cobb and Douglas's 1928 A Theory of Production fitted a production function to output, labour, and capital and made returns to scale something that could be estimated rather than only asserted. The referent is a relationship between inputs and output, not a rate earned on money, not an agent's accumulated reward, and not a value returned by a function.[2]
In reinforcement learning, the return is the total reward an agent accumulates from a given time step onward, usually with rewards further in the future discounted so that sooner reward counts for more: it is the quantity a value function estimates and the quantity the agent is built to maximise. Sutton and Barto's Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction (1998) defines the return as this discounted sum and makes it the target that policies and value estimates are trained toward. The referent is a sum of rewards along a trajectory, not a rate earned on capital, not the output from an input, and not a value passed back at the end of a subroutine.[3]
Next
See how return sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct