Construct · 3 fields · 4 citations

Where does pole collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, three constructs Nearest construct by meaningresiduecompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to pole is residue.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

pole3 CONSTRUCTSMagnetic poleGRIFFITHS · FIELD LINESPole (singularity)AHLFORS · BLOWS UPPole (control)OGATA · DENOMINATOR

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Physics

a region of a magnet where field lines are densest and appear to enter or leave, named north or south.

In electromagnetism a magnetic pole is a region of a magnet where the field lines are densest and appear to enter or leave the body, named north and south by convention. Griffiths sets this out in Introduction to electrodynamics, where the poles are not separable objects: cut a bar magnet in half and you get two smaller magnets, each with its own north and south, never a single pole on its own. The referent is a place on a physical body where a real magnetic field concentrates, measured in tesla. Dirac showed in 1931 that an isolated magnetic pole, a monopole, is allowed by quantum theory only under a strict condition, and none has ever been found. This pole is a region of space with a field in it, not a point on the Earth and not a singularity of a function.[1][2]

Unit
A region of concentrated magnetic field on a magnet
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Field strength and direction near the surface, in tesla, mapped to find where the lines converge

Complex analysis

A singularity where a function blows up

In complex analysis a pole is a kind of isolated singularity of a function: a point where the function grows without bound, but in a controlled way, so that multiplying by a finite power of the distance to the point makes it analytic again. Ahlfors treats this in Complex analysis, where the order of the pole is that power and the residue captures the leading term of the blow-up. The referent is a point in the complex plane attached to a particular function, not a place in physical space and not anything on the Earth. Near the pole the function tends to infinity, and the whole apparatus of contour integration turns on collecting residues at these points. It shares the word, and the underlying mathematics, with the control-theory pole, but here the object is any meromorphic function.[3]

Unit
An isolated point where a function tends to infinity
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Found as a zero of the denominator or from a Laurent expansion; described by its order and residue

Control theory

a root of the denominator of a system's transfer function whose position in the complex plane governs behavior.

In control theory a pole is a root of the denominator of a system's transfer function, and where it sits in the complex plane governs how the system behaves. Ogata sets this out in Modern control engineering: poles in the left half-plane give a response that settles, poles in the right half-plane one that runs away, and poles near the imaginary axis a response that rings for a long time. The referent is a specific number tied to a real linear system's dynamics, carrying a claim about stability. It is a special case of the complex-analysis pole, since the transfer function is a rational function whose denominator roots are its poles, but the two are worth keeping apart: one is a property of an abstract function, the other a statement about whether a physical system holds together.[4]

Unit
A root of a transfer function's denominator
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Computed as the roots of the characteristic denominator polynomial; read off the s-plane

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how pole sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

stability4 fields · 5 citationsjingle · one word, four constructsfield3 fields · 5 citationsjingle · one word, three constructspolarization6 fields · 11 citationsjingle · one name, six constructs

References

  1. Griffiths, D. J. (2017). Introduction to electrodynamics (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  2. Dirac, P. A. M. (1931). Quantised singularities in the electromagnetic field. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 133(821), 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1931.0130
  3. Ahlfors, L. V. (1979). Complex analysis: An introduction to the theory of analytic functions of one complex variable (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  4. Ogata, K. (2010). Modern control engineering (5th ed.). Prentice Hall.

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct