Construct · 6 fields · 9 citations

Where does resilience collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one name, six constructs Nearest construct by meaningstabilitycompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to resilience is stability.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

SPLIT BY HOLLING (1996)OUTCOME VS TRAIT · POOLEDresilience6 CONSTRUCTSEcologyREGIME PERSISTENCEEngineeringRETURN TO EQUILIBRIUMDevelopmentalOUTCOME · RISKClinicalTRAIT · SELF-REPORTCommunityPROCESS · CAPACITIESMaterialsENERGY · ELASTIC

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Ecology

the amount of disturbance a system can absorb before it flips into a different regime with a different structure.

The amount of disturbance a system can absorb before it flips into a different regime with a different structure. Resilience here is about persistence across multiple possible stable states, not about returning to one.[1]

Unit
An ecosystem
Recovery means
Staying in the same regime, not the same state
Measured by
Size of disturbance tolerated before regime shift; thresholds and basins of attraction

Engineering

the speed and reliability with which a system returns to its single equilibrium after a disturbance.

The speed and reliability with which a system returns to its single equilibrium after a disturbance. Holling named this in 1996 explicitly to separate it from the ecological meaning; the collision was drawn by the same author who created both constructs. Infrastructure research operationalizes it as loss of functionality over time (the "resilience triangle"), with four properties: robustness, redundancy, resourcefulness, rapidity.[2][3]

Unit
A structure, network, or community's infrastructure
Recovery means
Return to the pre-disturbance state, fast
Measured by
Return time; area of functionality lost over the recovery curve

Developmental psychology

good adaptation despite serious threats to development, inferred when a child has faced significant risk and is doing well.

Good adaptation despite serious threats to development. It is inferred, not measured directly: a child must have faced significant risk and be doing well. Masten's argument was that this is "ordinary magic", the product of common adaptive systems, not a rare trait.[4]

Unit
A person over developmental time
Recovery means
Competence on age-appropriate tasks despite adversity
Measured by
Two judgments (exposure to risk, and positive adaptation) never a single score

Clinical & personality

a self-reported individual capacity to cope with stress or, more narrowly, to bounce back from it.

A self-reported individual characteristic: the capacity to cope with stress, or, more narrowly, the ability to bounce back from it. This is the meaning most self-report scales measure, and it is the one most often pooled with the developmental meaning under a single heading.[5][6][7]

Unit
A person, right now
Recovery means
Self-rated bounce-back or coping capacity
Measured by
Likert self-report
Scales indexed for this construct
  • Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC)Connor, K. M., & Davidson, J. R. T., 2003 · coping with stress and adversity25 items
  • Brief Resilience Scale (BRS)Smith, B. W., Dalen, J., Wiggins, K., Tooley, E., Christopher, P., & Bernard, J., 2008 · ability to bounce back, specifically6 items
  • Resilience Scale (RS)Wagnild, G. M., & Young, H. M., 1993 · personal competence and acceptance25 items

Community & disaster research

a process linking a community's adaptive capacities, such as social capital and economic development, to adaptation after a disturbance.

A process linking a set of adaptive capacities (economic development, social capital, information and communication, community competence) to adaptation after a disturbance. Norris and colleagues were explicit that it is a metaphor, a theory, a set of capacities, and a strategy at once, and that the unit is the community, not the individuals in it.[8]

Unit
A community
Recovery means
Population wellness after a collective disturbance
Measured by
Capacity indicators; trajectories of population-level outcomes

Materials science

the energy per unit volume a material can absorb elastically and give back on unloading, up to the yield point.

The energy per unit volume a material can absorb elastically and give back on unloading, the modulus of resilience, the area under the stress–strain curve up to the yield point. This is the oldest technical meaning, and the one the word carried before any of the others borrowed it.[9]

Unit
A material
Recovery means
Full elastic return, no permanent deformation
Measured by
Stress–strain integration; J/m³

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

Combine items across the resilience scales to see whether the meanings separate empirically, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

stress6 fields · 8 citationsjingle · one name, six constructsrisk6 fields · 13 citationsjingle · one name, six constructsengagement8 fields · 13 citationsjingle · one name, seven constructs

References

  1. Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
  2. Holling, C. S. (1996). Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience. In P. C. Schulze (Ed.), Engineering within ecological constraints (pp. 31–44). Washington, DC: National Academy Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/4919
  3. Bruneau, M., Chang, S. E., Eguchi, R. T., Lee, G. C., O'Rourke, T. D., Reinhorn, A. M., Shinozuka, M., Tierney, K., Wallace, W. A., & von Winterfeldt, D. (2003). A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthquake Spectra, 19(4), 733–752. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1623497
  4. Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 56(3), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.56.3.227
  5. Connor, K. M., & Davidson, J. R. T. (2003). Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depression and Anxiety, 18(2), 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.10113
  6. Smith, B. W., Dalen, J., Wiggins, K., Tooley, E., Christopher, P., & Bernard, J. (2008). The Brief Resilience Scale: Assessing the ability to bounce back. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 15(3), 194–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705500802222972
  7. Wagnild, G. M., & Young, H. M. (1993). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Resilience Scale. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 1(2), 165–178.
  8. Norris, F. H., Stevens, S. P., Pfefferbaum, B., Wyche, K. F., & Pfefferbaum, R. L. (2008). Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(1–2), 127–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6
  9. Hibbeler, R. C. (2017). Mechanics of materials (10th ed.). Pearson.

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct