Construct · 3 fields · 5 citations

Where does ecosystem collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, three constructs Nearest construct by meaningenvironmentcompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to ecosystem is environment.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

ecosystem3 CONSTRUCTSEcosystem (ecology)TANSLEY · BIOTIC + ABIOTICBusiness ecosystemMOORE · BUSINESS ECOLOGYSoftware ecosystemMESSERSCHMITT · SOFTWARE

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

1935Ecosystem (ecology)1993Business ecosystem2003Software ecosystem
2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Ecology

Organisms plus their physical environment as one system

Tansley coined the word in 1935 in The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms, defining an ecosystem as the whole system formed by a community of living organisms together with the physical and chemical environment they occupy, treated as one interacting unit. Later work such as Lindeman's 1942 study of energy flow recast that unit in terms of feeding relationships and the transfer of energy between trophic levels. The referent is a natural unit of organisms and their surroundings, delimited in space by the observer and studied through energy and nutrient flow, not a community of firms or a body of software products.[1][2]

Unit
One bounded unit of organisms plus their physical environment, delimited by the observer
Recovery means
After disturbance it may move back toward a prior state through ecological succession, though not always
Measured by
Characterised by energy flow, nutrient cycling, species composition, and biomass across trophic levels

Management and strategy

An economic community of coevolving organizations

Moore introduced the business ecosystem in 1993 in Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition, arguing that a company should be viewed not as a member of a single industry but as part of an economic community of interacting organizations and people: suppliers, customers, competitors, and others whose capabilities coevolve around a new innovation. The referent is an economic community of firms and actors that develop shared capabilities together over time, a strategic borrowing of ecological language, and it is not a natural community of organisms nor a set of interdependent software products.[3]

Unit
One economic community of organizations coevolving around a shared innovation
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Described by the roles, relative health, and interdependence of member firms and the value they create together

Software engineering

Products and firms interacting on a shared platform

Messerschmitt and Szyperski applied the term to software in their 2003 book Software ecosystem, naming the set of businesses and their software products that function as a unit while sharing a common market and technology. Jansen, Finkelstein, and Brinkkemper's 2009 A sense of community set a research agenda that treats a software ecosystem as a set of actors and products interacting on a shared technical platform. The referent is a bounded set of software products, firms, and developers whose parts depend on a common platform, and it is distinct from a natural community of organisms or a strategic community of coevolving firms.[4][5]

Unit
One set of software products and firms interacting on a common technical platform
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Studied through platform dependencies, contribution activity, and the network of products and developers

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how ecosystem sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

community5 fields · 7 citationsjingle · one word, five constructsplatform3 fields · 5 citationsjingle · one word, three constructsniche6 fields · 7 citationsjingle · one word, six constructs

References

  1. Tansley, A. G. (1935). The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology, 16(3), 284–307. https://doi.org/10.2307/1930070
  2. Lindeman, R. L. (1942). The trophic-dynamic aspect of ecology. Ecology, 23(4), 399–417. https://doi.org/10.2307/1930126
  3. Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75–86.
  4. Messerschmitt, D. G., & Szyperski, C. (2003). Software ecosystem: Understanding an indispensable technology and industry. MIT Press.
  5. Jansen, S., Finkelstein, A., & Brinkkemper, S. (2009). A sense of community: A research agenda for software ecosystems. In 2009 31st International Conference on Software Engineering - Companion Volume (pp. 187–190). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-COMPANION.2009.5070978

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct