Construct · 4 fields · 6 citations

Where does range collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, four constructs Nearest construct by meaningspreadcompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to range is spread.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

range4 CONSTRUCTSStatistical rangeTIPPETT · MAX MINUS MINRange of a functionHALMOS · IMAGE OF DOMAINGeographic rangeBROWN · SPECIES TERRITORYVocal/musical rangeCOLEMAN · PITCH SPAN

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Statistics

The spread from smallest to largest value

In statistics the range is the simplest measure of how spread out a dataset is: the difference between its largest and its smallest value. Tippett's 1925 study On the Extreme Individuals and the Range of Samples Taken from a Normal Population worked out how this quantity behaves as a random variable and how it grows with the size of the sample, which made it a workable summary of dispersion. A related figure, the interquartile range, throws away the extremes and reports the spread of the middle half instead. Here the range is a single number describing scatter in data, not the outputs of a function, the territory of a species, or the pitches a voice can sing.[1]

Unit
One number: largest value minus smallest value, in the data's own units
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Computed as maximum minus minimum, or as the interquartile range from the first and third quartiles

Mathematics

The set of values a function outputs

In mathematics the range of a function is the collection of all values it actually produces as its input runs over the domain, also called its image. Halmos's 1974 Naive Set Theory sets out functions as a special kind of relation and defines the range as the set of second coordinates, the outputs the map really attains. It must be kept apart from the codomain, the larger set the outputs are declared to live in, which may hold values the function never reaches. This range is a set of outputs of a map, not the scatter of a dataset, the area a species occupies, or the span of a singer's voice.[2]

Unit
A set: every output value the function attains
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Determined by finding the image of the domain under the function

Ecology and biogeography

The area over which a species occurs

In ecology and biogeography a species' geographic range is the area of the Earth over which that species is found, described by its size, its shape, and its boundaries. Brown, Stevens, and Kaufman's 1996 review The Geographic Range set out how these areas vary in extent and internal structure across species, and Gaston's 1996 work charted the distribution of range sizes. Ranges are not fixed: Parmesan and Yohe's 2003 study documented many of them shifting toward the poles and up mountainsides as the climate warms. This range is a patch of territory on a map, not a number summarising data, the outputs of a function, or the reach of a musical instrument.[3][4][5]

Unit
An area on the map where a species occurs, in square kilometres
Recovery means
A contracted range can expand again where suitable habitat returns and dispersal allows recolonisation
Measured by
Delimited from occurrence records as extent of occurrence or as area of occupancy

Music and voice science

The span from lowest to highest pitch

In music and voice science the range is the span between the lowest and the highest pitch a voice or instrument can produce, the reason a soprano, a tenor, and a piano are each described by where their range begins and ends. Coleman, Mabis, and Hinson's 1977 study Fundamental Frequency-Sound Pressure Level Profiles of Adult Male and Female Voices charted the voice range profile, plotting the lowest to highest frequencies a voice can sustain at each level of loudness. Here the range is a span of pitch measured in frequency, not the spread of a dataset, the outputs of a function, or the ground a species covers.[6]

Unit
A span of pitch from lowest to highest note, in hertz or in musical intervals
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Charted as a voice range profile of fundamental frequency against loudness, or read off as the interval between the lowest and highest playable notes

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how range sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

spread5 fields · 5 citationsjingle · one word, five constructsdomain3 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, three constructsvariance4 fields · 6 citationsjingle · one word, four constructs

References

  1. Tippett, L. H. C. (1925). On the extreme individuals and the range of samples taken from a normal population. Biometrika, 17(3-4), 364–387. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/17.3-4.364
  2. Halmos, P. R. (1974). Naive set theory. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1645-0
  3. Brown, J. H., Stevens, G. C., & Kaufman, D. M. (1996). The geographic range: Size, shape, boundaries, and internal structure. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 27, 597–623. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.27.1.597
  4. Gaston, K. J. (1996). Species-range-size distributions: Patterns, mechanisms and implications. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 11(5), 197–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(96)10027-6
  5. Parmesan, C., & Yohe, G. (2003). A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature, 421(6918), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01286
  6. Coleman, R. F., Mabis, J. H., & Hinson, J. K. (1977). Fundamental frequency-sound pressure level profiles of adult male and female voices. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 20(2), 197–204. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.2002.197

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct