Construct · 4 fields · 6 citations

Where does variance collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, four constructs Nearest construct by meaningheritabilitycompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to variance is heritability.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

variance4 CONSTRUCTSStatisticsFISHER · SQUARED SPREADAccountingHORNGREN · BUDGET GAPZoning lawJUERGENSMEYER · ZONINGGeneticsFALCONER · HERITABLE

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Statistics

the expected squared deviation of a random variable from its mean, the basic measure of a distribution's spread.

The expected squared deviation of a random variable from its mean, the basic measure of how spread out a distribution is. R. A. Fisher named it in his 1918 paper The Correlation between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance, where the total variance of a trait could be split among its causes. The referent is a distribution or a sample, the unit is the square of whatever the variable is measured in, and the quantity is computed, never granted or negotiated. In machine learning the same quantity appears in the bias, variance decomposition of Geman, Bienenstock, and Doursat (1992): a model's expected error splits into a bias term and a variance term, and cutting one tends to raise the other. Here variance is a property of an estimator across hypothetical resamplings, still a squared spread, still a number.[1][2]

Unit
The square of the variable's units (a mathematical quantity)
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Computed as the mean squared deviation from the mean, on a sample or a distribution

Management accounting

the difference between a standard or budgeted figure and the actual figure realised.

In management accounting a variance is the difference between a standard or budgeted figure and the actual figure realised, the object of variance analysis. Horngren, Datar, and Rajan define it as the budgeted amount less the actual amount, split into price and quantity components and labelled favorable when it raises operating income and unfavorable when it lowers it. The referent is a pair of monetary or quantity figures for one period, the unit is currency or physical units, and the number is a signed gap, not a squared spread. It shares the word with the statistical meaning and little else: no expectation, no squaring, no distribution, just planned minus actual for a cost, a revenue, or a usage.[3]

Unit
Currency or physical units (a signed budget-to-actual gap)
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Standard or budgeted amount minus the actual amount, reported by line item

Land-use law

an administrative permission to use land in a way a zoning ordinance forbids, granted to relieve unnecessary hardship.

In land-use law a variance is an administrative permission to use land in a way a zoning ordinance forbids, granted by a board of adjustment when strict application would impose an unnecessary hardship on the owner. Juergensmeyer and Roberts, in Land Use Planning and Development Regulation Law, separate an area variance, which relaxes a dimensional rule such as a setback or height limit, from a use variance, which permits an otherwise prohibited use, each conditioned on statutory findings. The referent is a specific parcel and its owner, the unit is a granted or denied application, and the thing is a decision, not a quantity. Unlike every other meaning, this variance is not measured or computed; it is applied for, argued, and either granted or refused.[4]

Unit
A granted or denied application (an administrative act)
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Not measured; decided by a zoning board on statutory hardship findings

Quantitative genetics

the part of a trait's total variance attributable to differences in genotype, split into additive, dominance, and interaction components.

In quantitative genetics the genetic variance is the part of a trait's total (phenotypic) variance attributable to differences in genotype, and it partitions further into additive, dominance, and interaction components. Falconer and Mackay's Introduction to Quantitative Genetics defines narrow-sense heritability as the additive genetic variance divided by the phenotypic variance, the ratio that predicts a population's response to selection. Visscher, Hill, and Wray (2008) restate the same partition for the genomics era and caution against reading heritability as a fixed or causal property. The referent is a population and a trait, the unit is the square of the trait's units, and although this is a variance in the strict statistical meaning, it names a specific decomposition, additive against dominance, that the other three meanings have no counterpart for.[5][6]

Unit
The square of the trait's units (a partitioned population variance)
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Estimated from resemblance among relatives, as additive and dominance components of phenotypic variance

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how variance sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

noise4 fields · 5 citationsjingle · one word, four constructsgeneralization6 fields · 16 citationsjingle · one name, six constructsmateriality5 fields · 11 citationsjingle · one word, five constructs

References

  1. Fisher, R. A. (1918). The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 52(2), 399–433. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0080456800012163
  2. Geman, S., Bienenstock, E., & Doursat, R. (1992). Neural networks and the bias/variance dilemma. Neural Computation, 4(1), 1–58. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1992.4.1.1
  3. Horngren, C. T., Datar, S. M., & Rajan, M. V. (2015). Cost accounting: A managerial emphasis (15th ed.). Pearson.
  4. Juergensmeyer, J. C., & Roberts, T. E. (2013). Land use planning and development regulation law (3rd ed.). West Academic Publishing. ISBN 9780314286475
  5. Falconer, D. S., & Mackay, T. F. C. (1996). Introduction to quantitative genetics (4th ed.). Longman.
  6. Visscher, P. M., Hill, W. G., & Wray, N. R. (2008). Heritability in the genomics era: Concepts and misconceptions. Nature Reviews Genetics, 9(4), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2322

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct