Construct · 5 fields · 6 citations
One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.
● jingle · one word, five constructs Nearest construct by meaningtexturecompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to voice is texture.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
In grammar, voice (or diathesis) is the category that governs how a verb's arguments map onto the subject and object: an active clause makes the agent the subject, a passive clause promotes the patient to subject and demotes or omits the agent, and languages mark further voices such as the middle or antipassive. Klaiman's 1991 Grammatical voice surveyed these systems across languages and set out how voice reorganises the link between semantic roles and grammatical relations. The referent is a morphosyntactic property of clauses, described by the alignment of roles it produces, not a buzz of the vocal folds, a worker speaking up, or a melodic line in a score.[1]
In phonetics, voicing is whether the vocal folds vibrate during a speech sound: a voiced sound such as [z] or [b] is produced with the folds vibrating, a voiceless sound such as [s] or [p] without, and in stops the contrast is carried largely by voice onset time, the interval between the release of the closure and the start of that vibration. Lisker and Abramson's 1964 A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops measured this timing across languages and showed how it separates the stop categories. The referent is an articulatory and acoustic property of a sound, measured in milliseconds of voice onset time, not a grammatical category, an act of dissent, or a part in a chorus.[2]
In political economy and organizational behavior, voice is the attempt to change a dissatisfying state of affairs by speaking up rather than leaving it: Hirschman's 1970 Exit, voice, and loyalty set voice against exit as the two responses available to members of a firm or state in decline, with loyalty shaping which one is chosen, and later work such as LePine and Van Dyne's 1998 study of voice behaviour in work groups treated employee voice as a measurable, promotive form of speaking up. The referent is a person's expressed effort to improve a situation from within, counted by acts of raising concerns or suggestions, not a feature of a verb, a vibration of the larynx, or a strand of a polyphonic texture.[3][4]
In music, a voice is one of the independent melodic lines that sound together in a polyphonic texture, whether sung or played: writing for several voices means keeping each line coherent on its own while the lines combine acceptably, and the traditional rules of voice-leading describe how each voice should move from note to note. Huron's 2001 Tone and voice derived many of those voice-leading rules from principles of auditory perception, showing why lines written that way stay perceptually distinct. The referent is a part in a musical fabric, described by its melodic motion and its separation from the other parts, not a grammatical alternation, a phonetic feature, or an employee's protest.[5]
In narratology, voice refers to the narrating instance, who speaks in a narrative, as distinct from who sees. This meaning comes from Genette (1979) in Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method.[6]
Next
See how voice sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct