Construct · 2 fields · 4 citations

Where does feature collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, two constructs Nearest construct by meaningpattern recognitioncompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to feature is pattern recognition.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

feature2 CONSTRUCTSDistinctive featureTRUBETZKOY · CONTRASTFeature vectorMARILL & GREEN · INPUT

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Linguistics and phonology

Minimal contrastive property of a speech sound

In phonology, a distinctive feature is a minimal property of a speech sound that separates one meaningful sound from another, such as whether the vocal cords vibrate or whether the lips are rounded. Trubetzkoy's 1939 Grundzüge der Phonologie analysed sound systems as networks of contrasts between such properties, and Jakobson, Fant, and Halle's 1952 Preliminaries to Speech Analysis recast them as a small set of binary acoustic features that together describe every phoneme. The referent is an abstract contrastive property of language, defined by the oppositions it marks, and it has nothing to do with a buried trace at a dig or a measured number fed to a classifier.[1][2]

Unit
One binary or privative property of a speech sound, present or absent
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Inferred from minimal pairs and confirmed by acoustic and articulatory correlates

Pattern recognition and machine learning

Measured input property fed to a model

In pattern recognition and machine learning, a feature is a single measurable property of the thing being classified, and the ordered list of such measurements for one item is its feature vector, a point in feature space that a model reads. Marill and Green's 1963 On the effectiveness of receptors in recognition systems studied how well a chosen set of measurements separates the classes to be recognised, and Duda and Hart's 1973 Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis fixed the now standard vocabulary of features, feature vectors, and feature space. The referent is a number or attribute computed from data as input to a decision rule, not a property of a speech sound or a nonportable remain in the earth.[3][4]

Unit
One measured property of an item, one coordinate of its feature vector
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Extracted from raw data by hand-designed or learned transforms and judged by how well it separates classes

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how feature sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

artifact2 fields · 2 citationsjingle · one word, two constructsvariable4 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, four constructssignal5 fields · 5 citationsjingle · one word, five constructs

References

  1. Trubetzkoy, N. S. (1939). Grundzüge der Phonologie. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 7.
  2. Jakobson, R., Fant, G., & Halle, M. (1952). Preliminaries to speech analysis: The distinctive features and their correlates. MIT Acoustics Laboratory, Technical Report 13. MIT Press.
  3. Marill, T., & Green, D. (1963). On the effectiveness of receptors in recognition systems. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 9(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1963.1057810
  4. Duda, R. O., & Hart, P. E. (1973). Pattern classification and scene analysis. Wiley. ISBN 9780471223610

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct